13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON.<br />

the neighborhood or the news <strong>of</strong> the day. There were alsa<br />

it<strong>in</strong>erant tailoresses, though some <strong>of</strong> them carried on the<br />

"bus<strong>in</strong>ess at their own homes. They plied their trade <strong>in</strong> dif-<br />

ferent families, much as do the dressmakers <strong>of</strong> the present<br />

day. Cather<strong>in</strong>e (Phelps), wife <strong>of</strong> Simeon Parsons, carried<br />

on the tailor<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess for more than forty years, dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the latter half <strong>of</strong> the eighteenth century. Commonly she<br />

employed three or four apprentices, and sometimes more.<br />

Those who boarded themselves served for a year ; if she<br />

boarded them, they worked for her eighteen months. She<br />

made garments for most <strong>of</strong> the men <strong>in</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>, and<br />

for many <strong>in</strong> other towns. Major Hawley, Major Dwight,<br />

Mr. Stoddard, and a few others, had their coats made <strong>in</strong><br />

Boston, but their vests and knee-breeches were made by<br />

Mrs. Parsons. Her price for coats was <strong>from</strong> 6s. to 10s. ; for<br />

breeches, if made pla<strong>in</strong>, 4s. ; but if more elaborate, she<br />

charged 6s. For mak<strong>in</strong>g vests her charge was 4s. Major<br />

Hawley and others would employ her to turn their coats,<br />

after they had become worn. For many years after Mrs.<br />

Parsons was married, <strong>in</strong> 1752, there was no tailor <strong>in</strong> town.<br />

Women's Garments. The every-day dress <strong>of</strong> women, like that <strong>of</strong><br />

men, was <strong>of</strong> homespun material. It wasworn<br />

and reworn, perhaps not so <strong>of</strong>ten made over as at the<br />

present day, but the goods were much more durable. L<strong>in</strong>en<br />

and woolen, cotton and silk were used. Almost every one<br />

purchased "speckled calico," but ord<strong>in</strong>arily not <strong>in</strong> sufficient<br />

quantities for dresses. A material called "garlix"<br />

or " garlet," was <strong>in</strong> great demand. It was a species <strong>of</strong><br />

l<strong>in</strong>en, <strong>in</strong>dispensable <strong>in</strong> every household. "Lockram" was<br />

much used by both sexes for undergarments, before people<br />

manufactured cloth <strong>of</strong> flax for that purpose. "Slesy"^<br />

(silecia) was another k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> cloth much <strong>in</strong> use. The fash-<br />

ions were pla<strong>in</strong>, and the dresses were <strong>in</strong>tended for service<br />

rather than show. There was always a dress for Sunday<br />

<strong>of</strong> better material and more fashionable cut than the work<strong>in</strong>g-day<br />

garments. It was preserved with great care for<br />

many years and sometimes for more than one generation.<br />

Women bought many th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the merchants, but very<br />

few dress-goods. Most <strong>of</strong> the material used for gowns and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!