27.08.2013 Views

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

! !!<br />

"#$%&!'())!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!G+!9#6-$!<br />

In addition to an overall decline in agricultural employment, farm operators are<br />

increasingly utilizing off-farm jobs for a source of secondary income. In <strong>Boulder</strong> <strong>County</strong>,<br />

73 percent of operators reported having worked off the farm for a secondary source of<br />

income according to the 2007 Agricultural Census. The frequency of days worked off the<br />

farm increased for nearly all categories from 2002 to 2007 as shown in Figure 37. 738<br />

!<br />

Figure 37: Frequency of Non-Farm Work for<br />

Farm Operators in <strong>Boulder</strong> <strong>County</strong> 739<br />

The rise in off farm employment is largely attributed to the need for extra income to<br />

maintain the farm and the need for employer sponsored health care coverage. 740 Due to<br />

the large prevalence of self-employment by farm operators and small businesses in rural<br />

areas, adults are less likely than those in urban areas to have health insurance through<br />

their employers. 741 Additionally, as smaller farms continue to face competition from<br />

larger farms, second jobs and urban markets for agricultural products help to provide a<br />

cushion for smaller operations.<br />

Health Issues<br />

The Agricultural Health Study (AHS) is a leading long-term study funded and directed by<br />

the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences,<br />

the US Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Institute for Occupational<br />

Safety and Health. The study focused on the effects of environmental, occupational,<br />

dietary, and genetic factors on the health of the agricultural population. 742<br />

The overall cancer occurrence among farmers and their spouses was found by the AHS<br />

study to be significantly less than that of other non-farm men and women of the same<br />

age. This was attributed to less frequent use of tobacco products by farmers and a<br />

greater frequency of physical activity on the job than the general population. 743 While the<br />

occurrence of cancer for farmers is generally lower, the AHS study found that farmers<br />

may have an increased likelihood of developing certain types of cancer due to farm-<br />

744, 745<br />

related occupational exposures.<br />

Specific types of cancer that were found to be in excess in the studied farm workers<br />

included lymphohematopoietic cancers, prostate cancer, melanoma, ovarian cancer, and<br />

brain tumors. 746, 747, 748, 749, 750 The increase of specific cancer rates among agricultural<br />

populations has been linked to exposures to sunlight, dusts, pesticides, and other<br />

chemicals present on the farm. The specific contributions from each of these factors<br />

towards the development of cancer in farm workers are not entirely certain and require<br />

additional research and analysis. 751<br />

"''$"<br />

!,342#.5#6/1!78$.%3/23$1!<br />

9.21$#23$1!:1;.1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!