27.08.2013 Views

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

! !!<br />

"#$%&!'())!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!))+!9-%#/!H%-5-BF!<br />

Based on the above findings, and the fact that one-third of respondents were willing to<br />

lease all of their water, the surveyors concluded that there is enough willingness to make<br />

a leasing market economically viable. What is unclear at this point is the municipal water<br />

suppliers’ willingness to pay for leases and if so, whether the price they are willing to pay<br />

meets the desires of the rights holders. 860<br />

Land<br />

Competition for land use has economic implications for both the tax base and residential<br />

property values, however, decisions regarding land use are largely dependent on how<br />

the use contributes to the tax base. The American Farmland Trust (AFT) has performed<br />

numerous studies on the economic impacts of rural land development and has<br />

determined that in Colorado, residential development requires on average $1.15 in<br />

community services for every $1 of tax revenue it contributes. Farm and forest land<br />

requires $0.35 in services for every $1 of outgoing tax revenue. Finally, commercial and<br />

industrial uses demand the least services ($0.27 for every $1) relative to their<br />

contribution. 861<br />

The AFT’s methodology has received significant criticism, however, for being inadequate<br />

and biased. Researchers at Colorado State University performed their own analysis in<br />

an attempt to address some of the shortcomings of the AFT’s methodology. They<br />

calculated the ratio of community service cost to each dollar of generated revenue for<br />

each county in Colorado. Their analysis showed that “all Colorado counties, except<br />

Elbert <strong>County</strong> ($0.536:1), show a negative net fiscal impact of dispersed rural residential<br />

development and the majority lie within a range consistent with AFT findings…however,<br />

there is substantial variation across counties.” Their results also indicate that the<br />

character and type of development need to be considered, rather than aggregating landuse<br />

type, in order to determine whether or not it will result in a net fiscal loss. For<br />

<strong>Boulder</strong> <strong>County</strong>, the calculated cost ratio of providing community services per every<br />

dollar of tax revenue generated by converting 35 acres of agricultural land to one county<br />

average household is 1.108, demonstrating that converting agricultural land to<br />

residential use ends up costing the county. 862<br />

!<br />

"')%"<br />

!,342#.5#6/1!78$.%3/23$1!<br />

9.21$#23$1!:1;.1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!