27.08.2013 Views

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

! !!<br />

"#$%&!'())!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?=!@#-2$!A,2!<br />

from irrigation and precipitation. 268, 269 Reduced- and no-till operations have been shown<br />

to allow for greater soil water availability than conventional tillage practices by building<br />

capillary spaces for water movement and improving water retention. These practices<br />

have reduced water demands by up to 12 percent, according to the USDA.<br />

!<br />

"%'"<br />

270, 271<br />

Covering soil with mulched cover crops can reduce water loss from the soil. Creating a<br />

rough soil surface increases the area available to catch raindrops, thereby maximizing<br />

water availability and retention, and mitigating water losses. 272 Improving soil structure<br />

and organic matter content helps soil to retain water and also improves the availability of<br />

water to plant roots. Increased organic matter can increase water retention 273 and<br />

improve water percolation by up to 25-50 percent. 274 Additionally, improved soil stability<br />

reduces erosion and the resulting runoff.<br />

Efficiency of Ditch Delivery<br />

Unlined or earthen ditches are one of the least efficient irrigation delivery systems due to<br />

seepage losses through the soil (Figure 17). Estimates of water loss through seepage<br />

from unlined ditches have been calculated as high as 45 percent with the U.S.<br />

Department of Interior estimating a 22 percent average. 275 Methods proposed to improve<br />

the water delivery and efficiency of use include lining earthen ditches with impermeable<br />

materials to prevent seepage and replacing unlined ditches with pipeline delivery<br />

systems that can improve the efficiency by 10 percent (Figure 17). 276<br />

Figure 17: Potential On-farm Conveyance Efficiencies 277<br />

Inefficient irrigation from unlined ditches can have offsite benefits, such as providing<br />

habitat for a variety of wildlife, acting as an important source of recharge to shallow<br />

groundwater, and possibly providing groundwater return flow to streams and rivers. 278 In<br />

instances where these unlined ditches provide important off site benefits and the<br />

seepage is reduced by the addition of linings, there may be adverse effects to the<br />

beneficiary systems, which include ground water recharge, wildlife habitats, and wet<br />

areas. According to the USDA “without consideration and careful planning, irrigation<br />

project activities can negatively impact water quantity and quality, wetlands, fisheries,<br />

and wildlife.” 279<br />

!*+,-#./#012!34$.%+1-+$2!<br />

5.-2$#-+$2!627.28!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!