Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County
Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County
Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
! !!<br />
"#$%&!'())!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*+!,-./!01#/2&!<br />
!<br />
Graph 8: Irrigated Continuous Corn Grain Yields in Comparison to Nitrogen<br />
Fertilizer Rates for Conventional-till and No-till Farming, 2000-2004 373<br />
David Archer, an Agricultural Research Service economist, found no-till was more<br />
profitable than conventional-till on irrigated continuous corn crops because of lower<br />
machinery and labor costs, as well as a decrease in fossil fuel use. While Graph 8<br />
shows higher yields (crop production) for conventional-till agriculture when nitrogen<br />
fertilizer rates are equal, Graph 9 demonstrates that no-till farming earns higher net<br />
returns (financial income) when nitrogen fertilizer rates are equal. 374 Comparing the data<br />
from the two charts, as nitrogen fertilizer rates stay constant, no-till farming earns higher<br />
net returns even with lower yields. Additionally, future water supply issues could prove<br />
no-till farming to be the more desired method since it tends to need less irrigation. 375<br />
Graph 9: Irrigated Continuous Corn Net Returns in Comparison to Nitrogen<br />
Fertilizer Rates for Conventional-till and No-till Farming, 2000-2005 376<br />
"%'"<br />
!,342#.5#6/1!78$.%3/23$1!<br />
9.21$#23$1!:1;.1