27.08.2013 Views

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

! ! !!<br />

"#$%&!'())!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@+!A142!"#5#81B152!<br />

More recently, crops are being developed with stacked traits, also referred to as stacked<br />

genes. Stacking traits allows a crop to contain a variety and combination of traits including<br />

herbicide tolerant and insect resistance traits. 573 Other common traits incorporated and<br />

stacked in transgenic crops include disease resistance, high pH tolerance, and several<br />

nutritional, taste, texture, and shelf-life characteristics. 574 Gene stacking is becoming more<br />

common, particularly in corn and cotton varieties. For example, nine percent of corn and<br />

34 percent of cotton grown in the U.S. in 2005 were planted with stacked-gene varieties<br />

(Figure 28). 575 Other studies reveal an increasing trend for stacked genes occupying a<br />

growing percentage of GE crops worldwide, though specific percentages for Colorado<br />

could not be obtained. 576<br />

!<br />

Figure 28: Percentages of U.S. 2005 Crop Acreage Planted to Insecticidal,<br />

Herbicidal, and Stacked-Gene Varieties.<br />

The Economic Research Service (ERS) of the United States Department of <strong>Agriculture</strong><br />

(USDA) published a report in 2007 based on research collected and experiences gained<br />

with transgenic crops during the first decade of cultivation in the U.S. spanning the years<br />

1996-2005. 577 These authors concluded that transgenic crops could have environmental<br />

benefits due to generally decreased pesticide usage and stimulation of soil conservation<br />

practices. 578<br />

The reductions in quantities of herbicide active ingredients applied to GE herbicideresistant<br />

crops have shown decreases averaging 25-33 percent of overall use, according<br />

to a study conducted by Sankulat et al. 579 A separate study by Brookes and Barfoot, 580<br />

found a more modest decrease in pesticide usage averaging 6.3 percent. The authors<br />

used existing data on the farm-level impacts of transgenic crops to calculate the economic<br />

and environmental effects of all transgenic crops that had been cultivated over the nineyear<br />

period of 1996–2004. The crops evaluated included herbicide resistant soybeans,<br />

corn, cotton, and canola, as well as insect-resistant corn and cotton. The average<br />

reduction varies between 2.5 percent for herbicide-resistant corn and 14.7 percent for<br />

insect resistant cotton.<br />

While GE crops reduce the overall use of pesticides, they often increase the use of a<br />

specific type of pesticide for which the transgenic variety has been engineered to resist. 581<br />

As shown in Graph 20, a variety of herbicide resistant (in this case glyphosate) soybeans<br />

have reduced the overall quantity of non-glyphosate herbicides, but greatly increased the<br />

use of glyphosate. 582 This example is similar to other transgenic varieties, where overall<br />

pesticide use is reduced but applications of a single pesticide increased. This increased<br />

reliance and use of a specific pesticide has raised concern from many researchers about<br />

the increased development of resistant pests and in some cases the need for additional<br />

pesticides to combat the newly resistant pest varieties. 583<br />

As shown in Graph 20, transgenic crop varieties can reduce overall pesticide use and, to a<br />

lesser extent, provide greater yields and increased returns. The extent of these benefits<br />

depends greatly on the local conditions and farm operation as shown by the varying<br />

results presented.<br />

"$*"<br />

!,342#.5#6/1!78$.%3/23$1!<br />

9.21$#23$1!:1;.1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!