Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County
Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County
Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
! !!<br />
"#$%&!'())!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*+!,-./!01#/2&!<br />
season. This is dependent on rainfall distribution in relation to crop<br />
development.” 399<br />
Water consumption by a cover crop is a concern in areas with less than 30 inches of<br />
precipitation per year, like <strong>Boulder</strong> <strong>County</strong>. 400 Additionally, turning green manure into the<br />
soil requires additional time (labor) and energy expense, compared to not planting a<br />
cover crop. 401<br />
The indirect on-farm costs include hindering the establishment of the succeeding cash<br />
crop and cover crop management problems that impede realization of the expected<br />
benefits (i.e. over-vigorous cover crops that are hard to kill or incorporate). 402 Some of<br />
these potential disadvantages are highlighted in Figure 19. Also, cover crops have been<br />
shown to harbor insects, diseases, and nematodes that could be harmful to a cash crop,<br />
but conversely, have been used in conservation tillage systems to attract beneficial<br />
insects. Understanding these specific crop and pest interactions can be complex and is<br />
best evaluated at individual farms. 403, 404 For additional information see Pest<br />
Management.<br />
!<br />
"%#"<br />
!,342#.5#6/1!78$.%3/23$1!<br />
9.21$#23$1!:1;.1