Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County
Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County
Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
! ! !!<br />
"#$%&!'())!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!=+!>5?324!<br />
The decision was based on an environmental assessment conducted by APHIS, which<br />
was published for public comment in November 2010. The partial deregulation of RR<br />
sugar beets is an interim measure and the final ruling concerning full deregulation will be<br />
made by the end of May 2012 after a full Environmental Impact Statement is<br />
completed. 521 Their intent to allow planting of GE sugar beets in the meantime was made<br />
clear. 522<br />
Although the statement by the USDA on February 4 th allows partial deregulation of the<br />
planting of genetically modified sugar beets, a separate hearing was held on February<br />
15, 2011. 523, 524 During this hearing, the defendants, Monsanto Company, American<br />
Crystal Sugar Company, Syngenta Seeds Inc., and Betaseed Inc., sought to reverse a<br />
previous mandate requiring the removal of RR sugar beet seedlings that had already<br />
been planted. 525 Those in opposition included the Center for Food Safety, Organic Seed<br />
Alliance, Sierra Club, and High Mowing Organic Seeds. 526 This mandate was reversed.<br />
This decision was determined due to the fact that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate any<br />
likeliness of irreparable harm. 527<br />
!<br />
",%"<br />
!,342#.5#6/1!78$.%3/23$1!<br />
9.21$#23$1!:1;.1