27.08.2013 Views

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

Sustainable Agriculture Literature Review - Boulder County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

! !!<br />

"#$%&!'())!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!))+!9-%#/!H%-5-BF!<br />

11.1 Income<br />

The number of farms in the state of Colorado has remained relatively constant in recent<br />

years. From 2002 to 2007, Colorado’s agricultural sector experienced a 34 percent<br />

increase in market value (to $6,061,134,000), 33 percent of which came from crop<br />

production and the remaining 67 percent from livestock production. 825 However, between<br />

2008 and 2009 the agricultural sector as a whole saw a six percent decrease in output<br />

(to $6,639,721,000) and a 19 percent decrease in net value added (to $1,632,283,000).<br />

Farm operators have also seen a 37 percent decrease in net income, down from<br />

$1,178,935,000 in 2008 to $744,918,000 in 2009. 826<br />

<strong>Boulder</strong> <strong>County</strong> saw a much smaller, four percent, increase in market value between<br />

2002 and 2007. In contrast to the State, a substantial percentage of agricultural market<br />

value, 76 percent, was generated from crop production, while only 24 percent came from<br />

livestock production. <strong>Boulder</strong> <strong>County</strong> experienced a 28 percent increase in agricultural<br />

acreage from 2002 to 2007 compared to only a two percent increase for the entire state.<br />

This increase can be partially attributed to an increase in the number and diversity of<br />

farms responding to the 2007 Census in <strong>Boulder</strong> <strong>County</strong>. In these same years, the<br />

largest increases in production in <strong>Boulder</strong> <strong>County</strong> included haylage (1,107.3 percent),<br />

carrots (500 percent), angora goats (307.1 percent), and grapes (300 percent). The<br />

largest decreases included the number of pigs and hogs sold (69.2 percent), cantaloupe<br />

(66.7 percent), the value of pigs and hogs sold (64.6 percent), and the number of milk<br />

goats (51.6 percent). 827<br />

11.2 Farm Size<br />

The size of a farm, as defined by the<br />

United States Department of <strong>Agriculture</strong><br />

(USDA) Economic Research Service, is<br />

determined by examining a farm’s gross<br />

cash income: the sum of commodity sales<br />

revenue, government payments, and<br />

other on-farm income. Though the number<br />

of farms nation wide has remained stable<br />

at two million between 1991 and 2007,<br />

there has been a noticeable shift in size<br />

!<br />

"')&"<br />

Figure 42: Farm Size 828<br />

Non-commercial: gross cash income<br />

(GCI) of less than $10,000<br />

Small commercial: GCI of $10,000-<br />

$249,000<br />

Large commercial: GCI of $250,000-<br />

$999,000<br />

Very large commercial: GCI $1 million<br />

distribution from small, diversified farms toward large, specialized farms. In <strong>Boulder</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>, the average farm size has increased by 39 acres from 2002 to 2007. The<br />

<strong>County</strong> has seen a seven percent increase in the number of small farms, less than 50<br />

acres, which can partially be attributed to an increase in the number of farms responding<br />

to the census. 829 This suggests that the larger farms in <strong>Boulder</strong> <strong>County</strong> are continuing to<br />

get bigger, while at the same time smaller farms are increasing in number. This shift<br />

from small- to large-scale production is attributed to three main factors: profitability,<br />

advancements in technology, and increasing age of farm operators. 830<br />

!,342#.5#6/1!78$.%3/23$1!<br />

9.21$#23$1!:1;.1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!