11.10.2013 Views

Priscila Lena Farias / Anna Calvera Marcos da Costa ... - Blucher

Priscila Lena Farias / Anna Calvera Marcos da Costa ... - Blucher

Priscila Lena Farias / Anna Calvera Marcos da Costa ... - Blucher

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Living system design Studio: from digital to fabrication process<br />

determine the most strategic location of the movement sensors.<br />

The obvious chosen locations were frequently used spots. After<br />

the movement sensors had been installed in their locations, the<br />

3x1m modules were tested. All were firstly vali<strong>da</strong>ted individually,<br />

making sure that all the motors were responding and working<br />

correctly. This motors issue was very delicate. Since these<br />

electronic equipment are specific to micro scale tests, their<br />

durability and precision were very sensitive within this larger<br />

scale model. Basically the solution was to control their velocity<br />

and concurrency of movement. The final challenge was to make<br />

sure that all of the five independent structures were able to work<br />

together and could produce a unique and continuum movement.<br />

Figure 5. Discursive Wall in coffee bar at ISCTE-IUL, in Lisboa (photos by<br />

Alexandra Paio).<br />

4. Conclusion and future work<br />

This paper has presented only a brief outline of the design studio.<br />

The challenge of translating complex geometries based in<br />

living systems into a physical artifact was allowed by the application<br />

of advanced parametric 3D modeling techniques that directly<br />

were linked to CNC fabrication technology. The parameterization<br />

allowed: (1) a quick a<strong>da</strong>ptability to the several elements<br />

of the structure, and (2) the manipulation of the assembly parts<br />

only with simple assembly logic. The greatest difficulty was to<br />

improve the motors performance within the bearing system.<br />

The solution was to improve the continuous movement with a<br />

shorter and slower step-by-step movement. This was still able to<br />

create the illusion of a continuous movement.<br />

The future work will explore and create new wall systems. The<br />

adopted framework will be developed to seek new achievements<br />

by display more intelligent inputs. The new wall will respond and<br />

solve different issues related to solar radiation creating an autonomous<br />

input/output organism.<br />

Acknowledgment<br />

VitruviusFablab-ISCTE-IUL was responsible for the production<br />

and direction of the project. However, the project would not has<br />

been possible without the ideas, generous help and effort of the<br />

all the participants, and in special the trainers expertise: Ana<br />

Fonseca (DigitaLab), Catarina Louro (Fablabedp) and Nuno Valverde<br />

(Fablabedp). As well as, the institutional support of Prof.<br />

Vasco Moreira Rato (DAU-ISCTE-IUL). We are also grateful to the<br />

following organizations for the support: Amorim Isolamentos,<br />

Valchromat-Investwood, Ouplan-CNC Routers, Fablabedp, Rhino3DPortugal,<br />

Assessotel, Inmotion, Diversey, Arqa.<br />

Partipants: Ana Teresa Hagatong; Ana Carolina Cardoso; Bárbara<br />

Varela; Bruna Linhares; Daniel Mateus; Eduardo <strong>Costa</strong>; Francesca<br />

Mariotti; Frederico Carvalho; Jaime Mesquita; João Pedro Santos;<br />

José Gouveia; Luís Matos; Luís Marques; Helena Alarcão; Mariana<br />

Batista; Pedro Evangelho Toste; Rui Alberto Matos; Rui Lima; Rui<br />

Mota; Sandra Coelho; Thomas Pierre Yvon; Ulrike Seeber; Vítor Ribeiro;<br />

Wen Tao Bi.<br />

References<br />

Bonwetsch, T.; Baertschi, R. & Oesterle, S. 2008. Adding performance<br />

criteria to digital fabrication room - acoustical information of diffuse respondent<br />

panels. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of acadia,<br />

minneapolis: 364-369.<br />

Burry, M. 2011. Scripting cultures. Architectural design and programming.<br />

Wiley.<br />

Diniz, N. & Turner, A. 2007. Towards a Living Architecture. Proceedings of<br />

ACADIA 2007 Expanding Bodies.<br />

Fox, M. & Kemp, M. 2009. Interactive Architecture. New York: Princeton<br />

Architectural Press.<br />

Goulthorpe, M. 2008. The Possibity of (an) Architecture. New York: Routledge.<br />

Hensel, M.; Menges, A. & Weinstock, M. 2010. Emergent Technologies and<br />

Design. Towards a biological paradigm for architecture. USA and Cana<strong>da</strong>:<br />

Routledge.<br />

Kolarevic, B. & Klinger, K. 2008. Manufacturing Material effects. Rethinking<br />

Design and Making in Architecture. USA and Cana<strong>da</strong>: Routledge.<br />

Kolarevic, B. & Malkawi, A. 2005. Performative Architecture. Beyond Instrumentality.<br />

New York: Spon Press.<br />

Kronenbur, R. 2007. Flexible: Architecture that Responds to Change. London:<br />

Laurence King Publishers.<br />

Design Frontiers: Territiories, Concepts, Technologies 338

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!