25.12.2013 Views

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Through various cultural practices, ideological constructions, and subjects’ <strong>narratives</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

male homosociality, this chapter explored one <strong>of</strong> the central concerns <strong>of</strong> the thesis: the<br />

processes <strong>of</strong> negotiating heterosexual identity through negotiating masculinity. It<br />

showed how everyday male friendships that are <strong>class</strong>ed, gendered, and embedded with<br />

relations <strong>of</strong> the family and community confirm, subvert and reproduce the cultural<br />

constructions <strong>of</strong> hegemonic masculinity at the inter-subjective level <strong>of</strong> everyday<br />

practices and performances <strong>of</strong> homosociality. Narratives were deconstructed to show<br />

that the construction <strong>of</strong> hegemonic masculinity necessarily depended on the discursive<br />

subordination, rejection <strong>of</strong>, and distantiation from the ‘other’, in order to create <strong>of</strong> ‘a<br />

circle <strong>of</strong> legitimacy’ around the ‘self’ (Connell, 1995: 76). The paradoxical nature <strong>of</strong><br />

heterosexual self-making which depended on the other and simultaneously rejected it,<br />

brought out the dynamic processes <strong>of</strong> negotiating and ‘doing gender’. This was also<br />

shown by illustrating the multiple codes <strong>of</strong> hegemonic masculinity and the competing<br />

meanings and practices <strong>of</strong> ‘real’ masculinity. Masculinity in this sense is shown to be<br />

constituted simultaneously at the level <strong>of</strong> the social, institutional, structural, experiential,<br />

embodied, and the discursive (Holland et al., 1998: 149). I wish to conclude by arguing<br />

after Robinson (1996: 115) that if we are to see masculinity as contested, ambiguous,<br />

contradictory and open to change, then it is necessary to appreciate the ambiguity in the<br />

way masculinity is simultaneously both vulnerable and powerful. The next chapter,<br />

through an exploration <strong>of</strong> female homosocial intimacy, seeks to illustrate the<br />

constructive and negotiated nature <strong>of</strong> heterosexual feminine identities and intimacies.<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!