25.12.2013 Views

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

satisfaction giving meaning to life. It becomes one’s secular religion (Beck and Beck-<br />

Gernsheim, 1995: 168). However, as love becomes more important than ever before at<br />

the same time it becomes more elusive. Although love is a product <strong>of</strong> individualization it<br />

is in a way a move against it (Beck and Beck-Gernsheim, 1995: 182). As much as it lays<br />

stress on being different, being one’s own self, it promises togetherness to all those<br />

lone individuals (Beck and Beck-Gernsheim, 1995: 196).<br />

A pessimistic interpretation <strong>of</strong> this ‘transformation <strong>of</strong> intimacy’ is ‘liquid love’ (Bauman,<br />

2003) in ‘liquid modernity’ (Bauman, 2000), <strong>of</strong> men and women with weak bonds,<br />

specifically with none <strong>of</strong> the strong durable bonds that would allow the possibility <strong>of</strong> a<br />

stable self-definition and self-assertion that Giddens, as I will show, has espoused.<br />

Bauman (2000) expresses the contradictory nature <strong>of</strong> this institutionalized individualism<br />

as conflicting desires to tighten the bonds yet keep them loose, engendering what he<br />

conceptualizes as ‘Liquid Love’ in a ‘Liquid Modernity’.<br />

An optimistic interpretation <strong>of</strong> the ‘transformation <strong>of</strong> intimacy’ is a ‘democratized<br />

intimacy’ based on ‘pure relationship’ which despite making relationships more fragile,<br />

give rise to a more gender equal ‘confluent love’ or shared sense <strong>of</strong> self disclosure and<br />

‘plastic sexuality’ or a more responsive or creative form <strong>of</strong> sexuality, that is mutually<br />

pleasurable (Giddens, 1992). “A pure relationship is one in which external criteria have<br />

become dissolved: the relationship exists solely for whatever rewards that relationship<br />

can deliver” (Giddens, 1991: 6). This transformation <strong>of</strong> intimacy is intertwined with the<br />

reflexive ‘narrative <strong>of</strong> self’ (Giddens, 1992: 75). It is the ‘freeing’ <strong>of</strong> agency from<br />

structure that allows for increasing reflexivity with regard to the norms, rules,<br />

expectations and forms <strong>of</strong> authority associated with the ‘social’ life <strong>of</strong> modernity (Adkins,<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!