25.12.2013 Views

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

through continual self-surveillance and self-control (Bartky, 1990). Her persistent<br />

longing and hope to be blessed by her family, as familial recognition makes marriage a<br />

‘true’ marraige, in the absence <strong>of</strong> which it is ‘incomplete’; echoes Smart’s (2007)<br />

‘connectedness’ thesis that stresses on the significance <strong>of</strong> family, kinship and sociocultural<br />

relationality in shaping our very heterosexual desire and ‘practices <strong>of</strong> intimacy’<br />

(Jamieson, 2011). Her narrative <strong>of</strong> the entwinement <strong>of</strong> family sentiments and happy<br />

conjugality empirically demonstrates the resilience <strong>of</strong> hegemonic heterosexuality and<br />

renders other sexualities outside the patriarchal family, as deviation from the ‘normal’<br />

(Hockey et al., 2007: 23), as ‘incomplete’ and ‘untrue’. Pushpa’s romanticized<br />

heterosexual familial images <strong>of</strong> a daughter-in-law and a son-in-law particularly<br />

demonstrate that it is only through heterosexual relationships rather then gay or lesbian<br />

relationships that marraige is made ‘complete’ (Weeks et al., 1999).<br />

b) Imagination: Co-constitution <strong>of</strong> Self and Society:<br />

An interesting contradiction in the narrative <strong>of</strong> family as the basis for legitimate sexuality<br />

has been noted by Hockey et al. (2007) in their research on ‘mundane<br />

heterosexualties’. “Despite the social insistence that the family be the legitimate site for<br />

the expression <strong>of</strong> one’s sexuality, for some <strong>of</strong> its members, the family – both as an<br />

institution and a ‘location’ – can in practice represent a considerable barrier to sexual<br />

expression, communication or activity” (Hockey et al., 2007: 148). Pushpa similarly<br />

comes to represent contradictory subjecticities <strong>of</strong> heterosexual intimacy. Despite her<br />

insistence on the familial legitimation <strong>of</strong> her love, Pushpa constructs an imaginative<br />

space, a space <strong>of</strong> her ‘own’, her ‘dream home’ within her familial ‘home’ that lies outside<br />

all ‘societal rules and limits’. It is for her intimate imagination, possibly <strong>of</strong> both emotional<br />

209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!