25.12.2013 Views

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

conditioned by sedimented structures and the cultural imaginings (Smart, 2007: 29) <strong>of</strong><br />

gender, <strong>class</strong>, family (Jamieson, 1989) and the colonial-modernist bhadrasamaj<br />

(Majundar, 2000: 124), rather than being a product <strong>of</strong> unbridled individualism and<br />

embodying unbounded agency, as claimed by proponents <strong>of</strong> reflexive modernization,<br />

particularly by Giddens (1992). Such structural ‘field’ and its internalized ‘habitus’ do set<br />

limit to women’s ‘reflexive narrative <strong>of</strong> self’ and their intimate relations (Bourdieu and<br />

Wacquant; 1992: 16-19; Heaphy, 2007: 179); Lash, 1994: 120). In this sense, the<br />

emotional, intimate, private space <strong>of</strong> adda for individual women, as will be elaborated in<br />

further sections, can at best be seen as negotiated spaces <strong>of</strong> ‘bargaining with<br />

patriarchy’ (Kandiyoti, 1988). It sought ‘home’ within ‘home’; ‘our own’ ‘private’ within the<br />

‘private’. It was a negotiation that was not outside the heterosexual domestic and its<br />

associated gender inequalities, but it definitely problematized the idea <strong>of</strong> the domestic<br />

‘home’ or ‘private’ and therefore logically its ‘other’, the ‘public’. “The very division<br />

between an ‘inner’ and an ‘outer’ world is particular to Western conceptions <strong>of</strong> the self”<br />

(Hockey et al., 2007: 89) and maps onto the nationalistic discourse <strong>of</strong> ‘tradition’ and<br />

‘modernity’ (Chatterjee, 1989). Even in its habitation within the traditional private space,<br />

female homosocial intimacy destabilized a patriarchal trans-national and nationalistic<br />

dichotomy between the private and public or the female and the male which lies at the<br />

heart <strong>of</strong> a hegemonic heterosexual nuclear family (Sarkar, 2001; Beauvoir, 1972).<br />

Feminists’ critique <strong>of</strong> the non-visibility <strong>of</strong> women in the public world and their<br />

‘confinement’ within it is partly confirmed but also troubled by subjects’ narrativization <strong>of</strong><br />

this space. The individualistic, personalized, non-conforming idea <strong>of</strong> the ‘our own’<br />

private, troubles the conventional conceptualization <strong>of</strong> the private as the domestic and<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!