25.12.2013 Views

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

illustrations showed that it is not possible to rigidly categorize subjects in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

‘modern’ generation as opposed to the ‘traditional’ generation, and subjectivities<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> powerful/powerful and powerless/passive. Instead, heterosexual<br />

intimate practices must be seen as diverse and competing heterosexualities over<br />

a monolithic, trans-historical heterosexuality. Cross-generational <strong>narratives</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

coupling illustrated that cultural idealizations <strong>of</strong> heterosexual intimacy overlap<br />

with the cultural idealizations <strong>of</strong> the family and re-inscribe the structural and<br />

cultural inequalities <strong>of</strong> gender, generation and <strong>class</strong> that reproduce and amend<br />

the imperatives <strong>of</strong> hetero-normativity.<br />

d) The fourth chapter analyzed the processes <strong>of</strong> expressing heterosexual intimacy<br />

through negotiating the bhadralok ‘distinction’ and illustrated that personal<br />

expressions <strong>of</strong> intimacy are socially ordered, culturally learned and linguistically<br />

mediated. By showing, how ‘personal’ ‘scripting’ <strong>of</strong> intimacy is intervened by the<br />

intersection <strong>of</strong> gender, <strong>class</strong> and race, this chapter brought out the mutual coconstitution<br />

<strong>of</strong> personal and political, self and society, subjectivity and discourse.<br />

The chapter showed how nineteenth century colonial constructions <strong>of</strong> gender and<br />

<strong>class</strong> respectability were still intertwined with contemporary hegemonic codes <strong>of</strong><br />

bhadralok ‘distinction’. It illustrated bhadrasamaj’s vested interest in upholding<br />

bhadra and ruchishonmoto ‘script’ <strong>of</strong> intimacy and brought out subjects’ everyday<br />

inter-subjective negotiation, confirmation, circumvention and subversion <strong>of</strong> these<br />

hegemonic codes <strong>of</strong> <strong>class</strong>ed and gendered intimacy. It also showed that in these<br />

processes <strong>of</strong> negotiation, hegemony is a contested terrain within a rather<br />

fragmented, heterogenous <strong>middle</strong>-<strong>class</strong> that is continually struggling to<br />

296

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!