25.12.2013 Views

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the continuous discursive construction <strong>of</strong> heterosexual identities and intimacies. This<br />

appreciation <strong>of</strong> multiplicity both within and between the global and the local resists<br />

homogenization <strong>of</strong> men’s and women’s experiences <strong>of</strong> masculinities and femininities,<br />

and is able to appreciate multiple and <strong>of</strong>ten competing cultural <strong>narratives</strong> <strong>of</strong> ‘tradition’<br />

and ‘modernity’ in relation to practices <strong>of</strong> intimacy that are gendered, raced, and<br />

<strong>class</strong>ed. The tensions among these discourses and subjectivities are then shown to<br />

open up spaces for subverting and disrupting the discursive regime that construct the<br />

hegemonic <strong>narratives</strong> <strong>of</strong> ‘tradition ‘modernity’ and their associated politics <strong>of</strong> time, space<br />

and people.<br />

By contextually applying the centrality <strong>of</strong> ‘power and difference’ that lies at the heart <strong>of</strong><br />

Bourdiueu’s and Wacquant’s (1992) vision <strong>of</strong> ‘reflexive’ sociology (Heaphy, 2007: 178-<br />

179); and the deconstructive spirit <strong>of</strong> post-structuralism, post-colonial history and<br />

feminism within a sociology <strong>of</strong> heterosexual identities and intimacies, this research<br />

problematizes the ‘reflexive’ nature <strong>of</strong> reflexive modernization, reflexive narrative <strong>of</strong> self,<br />

the reconstructivist theories <strong>of</strong> modernity and the sociology <strong>of</strong> reflexivity it promotes<br />

(Heaphy, 2007: 15). This problematizing <strong>of</strong> the claims <strong>of</strong> ‘reflexivity’, through the<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> the central importance <strong>of</strong> power, difference and otherness, in any form <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge production, theoretically and epistemologically contribute to criticality and<br />

continuing debates within and outside <strong>of</strong> the discipline <strong>of</strong> sociology. This research<br />

suggests some possible although not exhaustible bases <strong>of</strong> self-criticality:<br />

a) recognition <strong>of</strong> power, difference and otherness even within the most ‘personally<br />

intimate’ and ‘objective’<br />

303

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!