25.12.2013 Views

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

narratives of three generations of urban middle-class - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

‘woman’ as a collective political identity and yet as simultaneously fragmented (Snitow,<br />

1990:9 cited in Glover and Kaplan, 2007: 6-7) is a concern that echoes a <strong>class</strong>ic<br />

Durkheimian problematic (1893)- what explains enduring connections and togetherness<br />

in social bonds (intimate bonds or gendered bonds in this context) that are enmeshed in<br />

a strong individualist culture. This Durkheimian concern that is broadly the concern <strong>of</strong><br />

sociology even in its contemporary times which tries to grapple with the interrelation<br />

between structure and agency (Giddens, 1984), is also a shared concern <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proponents <strong>of</strong> reflexive modernization or individualization thesis (Giddens, 1991; Beck<br />

and Beck-Gernsheim, 2002, 1995; Bauman, 2000). The sociological problematic <strong>of</strong> the<br />

collective versus the specific came with a culture <strong>of</strong> individualization and was echoed in<br />

the <strong>narratives</strong> <strong>of</strong> gender, intimacy and individualization. For instance, with increasing<br />

individualism, men and women wanted to become themselves at the same time when<br />

they wanted to become partners to each other in the face <strong>of</strong> weakening external bonds<br />

(Beck and Beck-Gernsheim, 1995). This brings us to the question <strong>of</strong> intimacy that is<br />

constructed within individualized cultures and analyzed by theorists <strong>of</strong> the<br />

‘individualization thesis’ who <strong>of</strong>fer a sociology <strong>of</strong> intimacy but <strong>of</strong>ten at the cost <strong>of</strong> over<br />

exaggerating the individual over the social and cultural (Smart, 2007; Jamieson, 1999;<br />

Gross, 2005). The following section is a review <strong>of</strong> the thesis and its critiques in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> intimate relations.<br />

Intimacy and Individualization:<br />

Stone, (1977) used the concept <strong>of</strong> “affective individualism” to convey the increasing<br />

glorification <strong>of</strong> personal emotion in England during the eighteenth century which he<br />

linked to a turn towards companionate marriage during that period. A companionate<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!