Vol. 53 - Alaska Resources Library and Information Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures 5 List of Tables 7 SUMMARY 9 1. INTRODUCTION 11 1.1 Objectives of the Research Program 12 1.2 Background 12 1.2.1 Hydrocarbon Accumulation 12 1.2.2 Histopathology 13 1.2.3 Biochemistry/Physiology 14 2. HYDROCARBON BIOACCUMULATION 15 2.1 Materials and Methods 15 2.2 Results 15 2.2.1 Mya truncata 19 2.2.2 Serripes groenlandicus 34 2.2.3 Astarte borealis 34 2.2.4 Nitrogen Heterocyclics 34 2.2.4.1 PANH Compounds in Oil 56 2.2.4.2 Astarte borealis: Bay 9: 1 Day 56 2.2.4.3 Astarte borealis: Bay 9: 2 Weeks 56 2.2.4.4 Serripes groenlandicus: Bay 10: 1 Day 56 2.2.4.5 Serripes groenlandicus: Bay 10: 2 Weeks 56 2.3 Discussion 57 3. HISTOPATHOLOGY 65 3.1 Materials and Methods 65 3.1.1 Collections 65 3.1.2 Processing 65 3.2 Results 68 3.2.1 Mya truncata 68 3.2.2 Macoma calcarea 75 3.3 Discussion 75 3
Page 1 and 2: Outer Continental Shelf Environment
Page 5: OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF ENVIRONMENT
Page 9: Outer Continental Shelf Environment
Page 14 and 15: 4. BIOCHEMICAL EFFECTS OF OIL 79 4.
Page 16 and 17: Figure 2.24. Aromatic hydrocarbon p
Page 18 and 19: Table 4.5. Table 4.6. Table 4.7. Ta
Page 20 and 21: the tissues. Three clams from Bay 1
Page 22 and 23: Since the Torrey Canyon incident, c
Page 24 and 25: Immunosuppression and the resulting
Page 26 and 27: Figure 2.1. BIOS site at Cape Hatt,
Page 28 and 29: Table 2.1. (Continued)
Page 30 and 31: Figure 2.2. Mya aromatic profiles (
Page 32 and 33: Figure 2.4. Concentrations of oil i
Page 34 and 35: Figure 2.6. Mya truncata-GC 2 profi
Page 36 and 37: Figure 2.8. Concentrations of oil i
Page 38 and 39: Figure 2.10. Concentrations of oil
Page 40 and 41: Figure 2.12. Mya truncata-GC 2 prof
Page 42 and 43: Figure 2.14. Mya truncata-Bay 11 (s
Page 44: In all cases but one (Bay 10, secon
Page 49 and 50: Figure 2.20. Serripes aromatic prof
Page 51 and 52: Figure 2.22. Aromatic hydrocarbons
Page 53 and 54: Figure 2.24. Aromatic hydrocarbon p
Page 55 and 56: Figure 2.26. Serripes-Bay 7 (aromat
Page 57 and 58: Figure 2.28. Serripes-Bay 11 (satur
Page 61 and 62: Figure 2.33. Saturated hydrocarbon
Page 63 and 64:
Figure 2.35. Astarte aromatic profi
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 2.37. Concentrations of oil
Page 67 and 68:
2.3 Discussion The analytical resul
Page 69 and 70:
Oil did impact the sediments of Bay
Page 71 and 72:
oil residues in the gut and muscle
Page 73 and 74:
As alike as Mya and Serripes behave
Page 75 and 76:
3. HISTOPATHOLOGY 3.1 Materials and
Page 77 and 78:
Table 3.2. Dates of collection and
Page 79 and 80:
Table 3.3. Summary of histopatholog
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83:
Page 86 and 87:
Figure 3.3. Hematopoietic neoplasm
Page 88 and 89:
y the oil has not been established.
Page 91 and 92:
4.2 Results Based on analyses of pe
Page 93 and 94:
clams from Bay 9 in the second post
Page 95 and 96:
Table 4.3. Mean concentrations of f
Page 97 and 98:
Table 4.5. Mean concentrations of f
Page 99 and 100:
Table 4.6. Molar ratio of taurine t
Page 101 and 102:
Table 4.8. The number of associated
Page 103 and 104:
overnight or even for several days
Page 105 and 106:
the second pre-spill sample (immedi
Page 107 and 108:
5. LITERATURE CITED Anderson, J.W.,
Page 109 and 110:
Gearing, P.J., J.N. Gearing, R.J. P
Page 111:
Roesijadi, G., J.W. Anderson and J.
Page 115 and 116:
** SPECTRUM DISPLAY/EDIT *
Page 117 and 118:
** SPECTRUM DISPLA/EDIT **
Page 119 and 120:
** SPECTRUM DISPLAY/EDIT **
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123:
APPENDIX II: ASTARTE BOREALIS: BAY
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
FILE NUMBER 12323
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
1UL/208L 2800V TH-WO A D-2 ** SPECT
Page 143:
APPENDIX IV: SERRIPES GROENLANDICUS
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
** SPECTRUM DISPLAY/EDIT **T
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
FILE NUMBER 18484
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163:
Page 167 and 168:
TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .
Page 169 and 170:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Station l
Page 171 and 172:
LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Ship operat
Page 173:
Table 22. Caloric intake from vario
Page 176 and 177:
The caloric intakes by juvenile kin
Page 178 and 179:
MATERIALS AND METHODS CRUISE OPERAT
Page 180 and 181:
Figure 2.--Station locations during
Page 182 and 183:
Table 1. Ship operations accomplish
Page 184 and 185:
Regression analysis was used to rel
Page 186 and 187:
SHIPBOARD OBSERVATIONS OF FEEDING B
Page 188 and 189:
Table 2. Clearance rates for all it
Page 190 and 191:
obtain sufficient weights all the s
Page 192 and 193:
RESULTS LOCATION AND COLLECTION OF
Page 194 and 195:
For tanner crab, C. bairdi, the fol
Page 196 and 197:
Table 3. Stomach fullness as a func
Page 198 and 199:
falling to an inflection point wher
Page 200 and 201:
Figure 5. Exponential decay curve f
Page 202 and 203:
Figure 7. Exponential decay curve f
Page 204 and 205:
Table 4. Stomach clearance rates fo
Page 206 and 207:
Estimating an appropriate residence
Page 208 and 209:
Figure 9. Volume of solids in stoma
Page 210 and 211:
Figure 11. Percentage of stomachs w
Page 212 and 213:
Table 6. Diel feeding chronology fr
Page 214 and 215:
as a function of the number of stom
Page 216 and 217:
Table 7. Percentage frequency of oc
Page 218 and 219:
Table 8. Uncorrected species compos
Page 220 and 221:
Table 10. Dietary composition of ju
Page 222 and 223:
The frequency of occurrence and die
Page 224 and 225:
Table 13. Dietary composition (% of
Page 226 and 227:
Table 15. Dry weights of prey items
Page 228 and 229:
Table 17. Dietary composition (% of
Page 230 and 231:
Table 18. Caloric values of marine
Page 232 and 233:
Table 19. Caloric values of tissue
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Table 26. Matrix of self and cross
Page 242 and 243:
There was an average of four prey a
Page 244 and 245:
Figure 13a. Loss of precipitin reac
Page 246 and 247:
Figure 14. An example of the algori
Page 248 and 249:
Table 28. Immunoassay precipitin re
Page 250 and 251:
Table 30. Immunoassay precipitin re
Page 252 and 253:
development of unique antigens to d
Page 254 and 255:
Table 31. Comparison of June dietar
Page 256 and 257:
Table 33. Comparison of overall die
Page 258 and 259:
items generally fall between 4000 a
Page 260 and 261:
Figure 15. Station locations near P
Page 262 and 263:
spills need consideration. The effe
Page 264 and 265:
mm) also occur in similiar habitat
Page 266 and 267:
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Juv
Page 268 and 269:
surface. The smallest juvenile king
Page 270 and 271:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Human endeavors ca
Page 272 and 273:
Conan, G., L. Laubier, M. Marchand,
Page 274 and 275:
Newman, G. G., and D. E. Pollock. 1
Page 277:
DISTRIBUTION OF LARVAL AND JUVENILE
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.2-1 Figure
Page 285:
LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1-1 Table 2.
Page 288 and 289:
(University of Alaska at Juneau) an
Page 290 and 291:
Kvichak Bay during September. The d
Page 292 and 293:
esults of many research projects ha
Page 294 and 295:
Figure 1.2-1 Location of study area
Page 296 and 297:
Data on distribution and abundance
Page 298 and 299:
shallow water for breeding around K
Page 300 and 301:
Interannual timing of the onset of
Page 302 and 303:
ecology of young juveniles in Dutch
Page 305 and 306:
SECTION 2.0 METHODS 2.1 Field Metho
Page 307 and 308:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB CRUISE 83
Page 309 and 310:
TABLE 2.1-1 SUMMARY OF FIELD SAMPLI
Page 311 and 312:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB STATION I
Page 313 and 314:
Larvae. Larval red king crab distri
Page 315 and 316:
TABLE 2.1-2 EPIBENTHIC SAMPLING GEA
Page 317 and 318:
2.2 Laboratory Methodology 2.2.1 Se
Page 319 and 320:
Resource Assessment. The conversion
Page 321 and 322:
egg condition for females. Analysis
Page 323 and 324:
SECTION 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Physical En
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
TABLE 3.1-1 SEDIMENT SIZE CHARACTER
Page 339 and 340:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB PERCENTAG
Page 341 and 342:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB TRAWL SAM
Page 343 and 344:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB SIDE-SCAN
Page 345 and 346:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB APPARENT
Page 347 and 348:
along the coast from Cape Newenham
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB LARVAL ST
Page 353 and 354:
esulted from the apparent concentra
Page 355 and 356:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB VERTICAL
Page 357 and 358:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB ESTIMATED
Page 359 and 360:
TABLE 3.4-1 NUMBER OF POST LARVAL R
Page 361 and 362:
1+ crabs were found, no age 2 crabs
Page 363 and 364:
TABLE 3.5-1 SUMMARY OF EPIFAUNAL SA
Page 365 and 366:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB ROCK DRED
Page 367 and 368:
A total of 317 crabs age 3 and youn
Page 369 and 370:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB DISTRIBUT
Page 371 and 372:
TABLE 3.5-2 TOTAL NUMBERS OF RED KI
Page 373 and 374:
The results of correlation analysis
Page 375 and 376:
TABLE 3.5-4 CORRELATION MATRIX FOR
Page 377 and 378:
ability (r 2 =0.9530) in the single
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
TABLE 3.6-1 TOTAL NUMBERS AND CATCH
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
3.7 Epibenthic Associations A varie
Page 387 and 388:
Dendrograms and two-way tables (not
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
SECTION 4.0 DISCUSSION 4.1 Larval D
Page 393 and 394:
density of 43 larvae per 100 m 2 wa
Page 395 and 396:
about 5 mm carapace length caught i
Page 397 and 398:
1981b). Larvae hatched in this regi
Page 399 and 400:
y strong tides, then similar larval
Page 401 and 402:
1967) to 11 molts (Weber 1967). The
Page 403 and 404:
Islands (Powell and Nickerson 1965;
Page 405 and 406:
species. The attached invertebrate
Page 407 and 408:
The approach taken in this analysis
Page 409 and 410:
Such information can be used to gau
Page 411 and 412:
BRISTOL BAY RED KING CRAB LEASE SAL
Page 413 and 414:
Other categories such as mature mal
Page 415 and 416:
populations are probably well prote
Page 417 and 418:
The second hypothesized effect of o
Page 419 and 420:
nearshore area of the coastal domai
Page 421 and 422:
Ecological Vulnerability. Armstrong
Page 423 and 424:
Bristol Bay, resultant mortality is
Page 425 and 426:
Togiak Bays where young juveniles w
Page 427 and 428:
SECTION 5.0 REFERENCES Anderson, J.
Page 429 and 430:
Cucci, T. and C. Epifanio. 1979. Lo
Page 431 and 432:
Ito, K. and I. Ikehara. 1971. Obser
Page 433 and 434:
Mecklenburg, T.A., S.D. Rice and J.
Page 435 and 436:
Rossi, S.S. and J.W. Anderson. 1977
Page 437:
APPENDIX A: MEAN LARVAL RED KING CR
Page 441:
APPENDIX B: TRAWL GEAR TYPES USED B
Page 444 and 445:
APPENDIX B (continued) 434
Page 447 and 448:
APPENDIX C TRAWL/DREDGE NOTES 437
Page 449 and 450:
APPENDIX C (continued) 439
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463:
APPENDIX D: GUT CONTENT ANALYSIS FI
Page 466 and 467:
APPENDIX D (continued) 456
Page 468 and 469:
APPENDIX D (continued) 458
Page 471 and 472:
APPENDIX E MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSI
Page 473 and 474:
APPENDIX E (continued) 463
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481:
Page 485 and 486:
APPENDIX F JUVENILE RED KING CRAB S
Page 487:
APPENDIX F (continued) Results and
Page 491 and 492:
Page 493 and 494:
6.0 DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF S
Page 495 and 496:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 Station
Page 497 and 498:
Figure 4.1 Figure 4.2a Figure 4.2b
Page 499 and 500:
Figure 6.9 Distribution and abundan
Page 501 and 502:
LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Table 2.2
Page 503:
Table 6.1 Table 6.2 Table 6.3 Table
Page 506 and 507:
Service (NMFS) groundfish surveys i
Page 508 and 509:
published prior to an anticipated l
Page 510 and 511:
2. Larval crustaceans are more sens
Page 512 and 513:
eastern Bering Sea to date and, for
Page 515 and 516:
2.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1 Sampl
Page 517 and 518:
However, the data are not included
Page 519 and 520:
not to subsample depended on the si
Page 521 and 522:
Table 2.2. List of taxonomic levels
Page 523 and 524:
In our annual report (Armstrong et
Page 525 and 526:
Bongo samples were usually split no
Page 527 and 528:
larvae. A computer program was used
Page 529 and 530:
Figs. 2.1 - 2.18. Station locations
Page 531 and 532:
521
Page 533 and 534:
523
Page 535 and 536:
525
Page 537 and 538:
527
Page 539 and 540:
Figure 2.19 Station locations of Ju
Page 541 and 542:
3.0 DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF K
Page 543 and 544:
Fig. 3.2. NMFS eastern Bering Sea c
Page 545 and 546:
Fig. 3.3. Distribution of female re
Page 547 and 548:
and then increased through 1979 (Ot
Page 549 and 550:
3.1.2 Reproduction In late winter a
Page 551 and 552:
3.1.3 Larval Development Larvae are
Page 553 and 554:
(SII) varies from 24 days at 2°C t
Page 555 and 556:
Fig. 3.6. Distribution of blue king
Page 557 and 558:
Fig. 3.7b. Distribution and relativ
Page 559 and 560:
Fig. 3.8. Index map for proposed OC
Page 561 and 562:
per female. Larvae hatch around the
Page 563 and 564:
Fig. 3.9. Relative contributions of
Page 565 and 566:
Marasco 1980). Legal size at recrui
Page 567 and 568:
Fig. 3.11. Distribution and relativ
Page 569 and 570:
Fig. 3.12. A modification of Fig. 2
Page 571 and 572:
density. Such low abundance reitera
Page 573 and 574:
Fig. 3.13. Distribution and relativ
Page 575 and 576:
Fig. 3.14. Abundance of red king cr
Page 577 and 578:
ut larvae were very abundant in 61-
Page 579 and 580:
strata (I and II) were created to g
Page 581 and 582:
Table 3.3. Mean abundance of larval
Page 583 and 584:
Six time intervals were established
Page 585 and 586:
Fig. 3.17b. Larval frequency of occ
Page 587 and 588:
Fig. 3.18. Differences in apparent
Page 589 and 590:
Fig. 3.19. Frequency of occurrence
Page 591 and 592:
Fig. 3.20. Increase in dry weight o
Page 593 and 594:
1008 mg/larva, but those molting to
Page 595 and 596:
consider in regard to king crab bio
Page 597 and 598:
Fig. 3.22. Annual distribution and
Page 599 and 600:
Table 3.4. Relative annual abundanc
Page 601 and 602:
predator pressure and low (to no) s
Page 603 and 604:
fecundity to derive potential larva
Page 605 and 606:
4.0 DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF T
Page 607 and 608:
Fig. 4.1. Commercial landings of Ta
Page 609 and 610:
Table 4.1 (Cont.)
Page 611 and 612:
Fig. 4.2a. Sub-areas defined for th
Page 613 and 614:
Fig. 4.3. Principal areas of 1980 T
Page 615 and 616:
et al. 1975; Donaldson et al. 1980)
Page 617 and 618:
are reported in detail by Incze (19
Page 619 and 620:
Table 4.2. Timing of appearance of
Page 621 and 622:
female crabs sampled in late May an
Page 623 and 624:
this low number of larvae increased
Page 625 and 626:
Table 4.4. Zoeal development of Chi
Page 627 and 628:
Table 4.6. Weighted average proport
Page 629 and 630:
Data on the timing of molt from SII
Page 631 and 632:
Kon (1970) reported on the basis of
Page 633 and 634:
Fig. 4.6. Vertical distribution of
Page 635 and 636:
Page 637 and 638:
Page 639 and 640:
earlier discussion). There was no d
Page 641 and 642:
general, spatial patterns of larval
Page 643 and 644:
Figure 4.12 Distribution and abunda
Page 645 and 646:
1983). The relative contribution of
Page 647:
over 1 larva/m 3 (common abundance)
Page 650 and 651:
Table 5.1. Size, depth distribution
Page 652 and 653:
catchability in survey gear used. W
Page 654 and 655:
of the North Aleutian Shelf, partic
Page 656 and 657:
alutaceus was encountered in 47.8%
Page 658 and 659:
5.2 Purpose and Scope The purpose o
Page 660 and 661:
Table 5.4. Brachyura taxa identifie
Page 662 and 663:
stations had to satisfy criterion N
Page 664 and 665:
Figure 5.2 Vertical distribution of
Page 666 and 667:
taxa were collected too sporadicall
Page 668 and 669:
Table 5.5. Frequency of occurrence
Page 670 and 671:
Figure 5.4 Locations and densities
Page 672 and 673:
abundant in strata 6, 11, and 12 in
Page 674 and 675:
fined somewhat based on data from 1
Page 676 and 677:
Page 678 and 679:
Page 680 and 681:
them. Contrasts can be made to high
Page 682 and 683:
5.11 Distribution of mean density w
Page 684 and 685:
hints at the species' response to a
Page 686 and 687:
Page 688:
Figure 5.14 Cross and long-shelf pa
Page 691 and 692:
1981
Page 693 and 694:
Page 695 and 696:
Figure 5.16 Mean density and one st
Page 697 and 698:
Page 699 and 700:
Figure 5.18 Mean density and one st
Page 701 and 702:
early-June; SII from early-June to
Page 703 and 704:
Page 705 and 706:
6.0 DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF S
Page 707 and 708:
maturity as males at age 3.5 years
Page 709 and 710:
Wigley 1969; Rasmussen 1953 from Bu
Page 711 and 712:
Gulf of Maine were found to move in
Page 713 and 714:
shrimp survey conducted in Unalaska
Page 715 and 716:
single brood (Berkeley 1930). It is
Page 717 and 718:
Table 6.2. Life history information
Page 719 and 720:
Table 6.3. Life history information
Page 721 and 722:
distinctive group. Most notable cha
Page 723 and 724:
sampling patterns within the St. Ge
Page 725 and 726:
Figure 6.2 Duration of larval stage
Page 727 and 728:
Figure 6.3 Pandalus borealis stage
Page 729 and 730:
June 1978 compared to June 1981. Co
Page 731 and 732:
Figure 6.5 Distribution of Pandalus
Page 733 and 734:
Page 735 and 736:
Page 737 and 738:
George Basin and extended over the
Page 739 and 740:
Table 6.5. Cross-shelf comparison o
Page 741 and 742:
Figure6.11 Vertical Depth Distribut
Page 743 and 744:
Page 745 and 746:
Figure 6.15 P. tridens larval abund
Page 747 and 748:
Table 6.6. Cross-shelf comparison o
Page 749 and 750:
Distribution and Abundance of Panda
Page 751 and 752:
2) While hatchout of P. borealis la
Page 753 and 754:
Page 755 and 756:
months within a single year can be
Page 757 and 758:
Figure 6.21 Hippolytidae shrimp lar
Page 759 and 760:
Figure 6.22 Vertical depth distribu
Page 761 and 762:
Page 763 and 764:
Figure6.24 Crangon spp. larval stag
Page 765 and 766:
most probably due to the mix of spe
Page 767 and 768:
Larval crangonids, Crangon spp., we
Page 769 and 770:
Page 771 and 772:
Page 773 and 774:
larval densities were generally low
Page 775 and 776:
Page 777 and 778:
Figure 6.33 Penaeid sp. larval stag
Page 779 and 780:
Figure 6.34 Penaeid sp. stage frequ
Page 781 and 782:
in 1981 due to the sampling pattern
Page 783 and 784:
Page 785:
5. Crangonid larvae are the least a
Page 788 and 789:
Table 7.1. Frequency of adult and j
Page 790 and 791:
7.1.2 Reproduction Reproductive sea
Page 792 and 793:
7.2.1 Larval Duration Although seve
Page 794 and 795:
7.2.2 Distribution and Abundance Si
Page 796 and 797:
Page 798 and 799:
Page 800 and 801:
into strata of the outer shelf doma
Page 802 and 803:
Figure 7.7 Vertical depth distribut
Page 804 and 805:
dark hours showed very different di
Page 807 and 808:
8.0 POSSIBLE OIL IMPACTS ON DECAPOD
Page 809 and 810:
circulating over the shelf. Current
Page 811 and 812:
Sonntag et al. (1980). Following hy
Page 813 and 814:
8.2.1 Effects on Larvae A wealth of
Page 815 and 816:
crustaceans that results in greater
Page 817 and 818:
The second hypothesized effect of o
Page 819 and 820:
proportion of infertile egg masses
Page 821 and 822:
high concentrations to be toxic. Ba
Page 823 and 824:
of oil rapidly over the surface (Le
Page 825 and 826:
strongly disagree with this hypothe
Page 827 and 828:
gal; specific gravity of oil about
Page 829 and 830:
Figure 8.2 Lease sale areas in the
Page 831 and 832:
8.4). During summer and fall, oil f
Page 833 and 834:
most of this region and, as suggest
Page 835 and 836:
found from Unimak Island to Cape Se
Page 837 and 838:
8.5.4 Other Brachyuran Larvae Larva
Page 839 and 840:
search is called for on this group
Page 841:
1. Impact of oil via water and sedi
Page 844 and 845:
Balsiger, J. W. 1976. A computer si
Page 846 and 847:
Donaldson, W. E. 1980. Alaska Tanne
Page 848 and 849:
Hameedi, M. J. 1982. The St. George
Page 850 and 851:
INPFC - International North Pacific
Page 852 and 853:
Kendall, A. W., Jr., J. R. Dunn, R.
Page 854 and 855:
Lee, R. F., C. Ryan and M. L. Neuha
Page 856 and 857:
McLaughlin, P. A. 1963. Survey of t
Page 858 and 859:
Olsen, J. C. 1961. Pandalid shrimp
Page 860 and 861:
Rathbun, M. J. 1918. The grapsoid c
Page 862 and 863:
Sitts, R., and A. Knight. 1979. Pre
Page 864 and 865:
elongatus in the northeastern and e
Page 866 and 867:
Young, A. and T. Hazlett. 1978. The
Page 869:
APPENDIX A: S.E. Bering Sea shrimp
Page 872 and 873:
APPENDIX B. References used for ide
Page 875:
Distinguishing Between Chionoecetes
Page 879 and 880:
DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN CHIONOECETES
Page 881 and 882:
Measurements were made of PLS lengt
Page 883 and 884:
Figure 1. Comparison of PLS length
Page 885 and 886:
Table 1. Rostral-dorsal lengths of
Page 887 and 888:
We also compared our diagnostic fea
show all

Vol. 53 - Alaska Resources Library and Information Services

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?