29.12.2013 Views

Vol. 53 - Alaska Resources Library and Information Services

Vol. 53 - Alaska Resources Library and Information Services

Vol. 53 - Alaska Resources Library and Information Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Oil did impact the sediments of Bays 9 <strong>and</strong> 10 immediately after the dispersed<br />

oil spill where initially a significant amount of the sedimented oil (~20%) resided in the<br />

surface floc. Sedimentation rates were estimated to be in the 2-10 mg/m 2 /day range.<br />

Subsequently, the floc was tranported elsewhere, probably offshore, because floc from all<br />

bays sampled in the second post-spill period (September 11) was free of any detectable oil.<br />

Levels of oil in the sediments, however, remained elevated (1-5 ppm) in Bays 9 <strong>and</strong> 10 <strong>and</strong><br />

although this dosing is considerably less than a "massive" dosing, it will continue to affect<br />

benthic biota for an unknown period of time. The overall sediment impact due to passage<br />

of dispersed oil through Bays 9 <strong>and</strong> 10 was minimal, with less than 1 % of the discharged<br />

oil probably residing in the sediment at any time.<br />

Results from the initial sampling of sediments indicated that 80 % of the oil<br />

detected in the top 0-3 cm was not associated with the floc. This is in contrast to results<br />

from other spills (e.g., Boehm, Barak, Fiest <strong>and</strong> Elskus 1982; Boehm, Wait,<br />

Fiest <strong>and</strong> Pilson 1982) <strong>and</strong> to experimental tank studies (Gearing et al., 1980)<br />

in which most of the initially sediment-associated oil was in the floc layer.<br />

What appears to be occurring in the BIOS dispersed oil spill is a low level,<br />

direct <strong>and</strong> rapid penetration of dispersed oil into the bulk surface sediment,<br />

presumably<br />

a process mediated by the decrease of the oil's interfacial tension<br />

due to chemical dispersion allowing for penetration of the solid interface<br />

perhaps into interstitial waters. Indeed chemical results from polychaete<br />

analyses in Bays 9 <strong>and</strong> 10 (Norstrom <strong>and</strong> Engelhardt, 1982) revealed an<br />

initial uptake of an alkylated benzene <strong>and</strong> napthalene (i.e., water-soluble<br />

fraction) enriched petroleum hydrocarbon assemblage in Bays 9 <strong>and</strong> 10 only,<br />

perhaps associated with interstitial water penetration of fractions of the oil.<br />

The Bay 7 "control" did receive 50-100 ppb of dispersed oil in the first few<br />

days after the discharge. This quantity of oil was measured directly (Green et al., 1982)<br />

<strong>and</strong> was monitored indirectly through hydrocarbon body burdens in filter-feeding bivalves<br />

(i.e., Mya, Serripes). Direct sediment analyses <strong>and</strong> indirect evidence from deposit-feeding<br />

animals (Macoma, Strongylocentrotus) indicate, however, that oil impact to Bay 7<br />

sediments was quite minimal with only patchy low level inputs noted. The Bay 7<br />

analytical results point to an important conclusion regarding application of UV/F <strong>and</strong> GC 2<br />

techniques to the BIOS study. While background (by UV/F) levels of "oil equivalents" in<br />

the sediments was ~0.5 ppm, many samples did exhibit post-spill oil levels of 1.0-1.5 ppm.<br />

In this concentration, range levels were too low to unambiguously yield an oil/no oil<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!