29.12.2013 Views

Vol. 53 - Alaska Resources Library and Information Services

Vol. 53 - Alaska Resources Library and Information Services

Vol. 53 - Alaska Resources Library and Information Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

stations in this area where larval king crab were abundant were also<br />

rich in phytoplankton; so much so that nets apparently clogged as<br />

evidenced by very low volumes filtered per unit time compared to other<br />

stations of comparable depth. Resultant calculations of high larval<br />

densities reflect either the actual at the time in Inner Bristol Bay, or<br />

possibly inflated values caused by inaccurate estimates of volume<br />

filtered.<br />

Stage IV zoeae were the most advanced larvae collected during the second<br />

cruise through June 14. No megalops larvae were found in June 1983,<br />

although they were present between Unimak Isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Cape Seniavin at<br />

the same time in 1982 (Armstrong, et al. 1983b). No king crab larval<br />

stages were found in zooplankton samples collected in mid-September<br />

1983. All larvae had apparently metamorphosed by this date <strong>and</strong>, as<br />

discussed in Section 3.4 on juveniles, young-of-the-year crab were<br />

caught at this time in areas largely outside the regions of high larval<br />

abundance.<br />

Date of Hatch. The first zooplankton samples were collected during a<br />

sweep along the nearshore NAS from Unimak Isl<strong>and</strong> to Kvichak Bay in<br />

mid-April 1983. Few larvae were found during that first pass of the<br />

area <strong>and</strong> additional samples were taken as the ship left Bristol Bay<br />

between May 1 <strong>and</strong> 5. More red king crab larvae were found in this<br />

second group of samples, indicating that a substantial part of the 1983<br />

hatch occurred in the last week of April through the first week of May.<br />

Hatch did not apparently continue for a prolonged period throughout the<br />

nearshore range of the population because: 1) average densities in<br />

April, May <strong>and</strong> June did not increase substantially (Table 3.2-1) in<br />

subareas IL <strong>and</strong> PM; <strong>and</strong> 2) zoeal stage frequency over these months<br />

showed a shift to later stages consistent with the molting schedule of a<br />

single, dominant cohort. There was no apparent <strong>and</strong> substantial hatch<br />

that occurred in late May <strong>and</strong> early June in subareas IL, PM <strong>and</strong> PH based<br />

on stage frequencies (Figure 3.2-3). Frequency of occurrence of larval<br />

stages in samples taken from eastern Unimak Isl<strong>and</strong> to Port Heiden over a<br />

340

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!