2007 Trafficking in Persons Report - Center for Women Policy Studies
2007 Trafficking in Persons Report - Center for Women Policy Studies
2007 Trafficking in Persons Report - Center for Women Policy Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
I N T R O D U C T I O N<br />
To compile this year’s <strong>Report</strong>, the Department<br />
took a fresh look at <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation sources on every<br />
country to make its assessments. Assess<strong>in</strong>g each<br />
government’s anti-traffick<strong>in</strong>g ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>in</strong>volves a<br />
two-step process:<br />
Step One: F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Significant<br />
Numbers of Victims<br />
First, the Department determ<strong>in</strong>es whether a country<br />
is “a country of orig<strong>in</strong>, transit, or dest<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>for</strong><br />
a significant number of victims of severe <strong>for</strong>ms of<br />
traffick<strong>in</strong>g,” generally on the order of 100 or more<br />
victims, the same threshold applied <strong>in</strong> previous<br />
reports. Some countries, <strong>for</strong> which such <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation<br />
was not available, are not given tier rat<strong>in</strong>gs, but<br />
are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Special Case section because<br />
they exhibited <strong>in</strong>dications of traffick<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Step Two: Tier Placement<br />
The Department places each country <strong>in</strong>cluded on<br />
the <strong>2007</strong> TIP <strong>Report</strong> <strong>in</strong>to one of the three lists,<br />
described here as tiers, mandated by the TVPA.<br />
This placement is based more on the extent of<br />
government action to combat traffick<strong>in</strong>g, rather<br />
than the size of the problem, important though<br />
that is. The Department first evaluates whether<br />
the government fully complies with the TVPA’s<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imum standards <strong>for</strong> the elim<strong>in</strong>ation of traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(detailed on pp. 228-229). Governments<br />
that do fully comply are placed <strong>in</strong> Tier 1. For other<br />
governments, the Department considers whether<br />
they are mak<strong>in</strong>g significant ef<strong>for</strong>ts to br<strong>in</strong>g<br />
themselves <strong>in</strong>to compliance. Governments that are<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g significant ef<strong>for</strong>ts to meet the m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
standards are placed <strong>in</strong> Tier 2. Governments that<br />
do not fully comply with the m<strong>in</strong>imum standards<br />
and are not mak<strong>in</strong>g significant ef<strong>for</strong>ts to do so are<br />
placed <strong>in</strong> Tier 3. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the Special Watch List<br />
criteria are considered and, when applicable, Tier<br />
2 countries are placed on the Tier 2 Watch List.<br />
The Special Watch List—<br />
Tier 2 Watch List<br />
The TVPA created a “Special Watch List” of countries<br />
on the TIP <strong>Report</strong> that should receive special<br />
scrut<strong>in</strong>y. The list is composed of: 1) Countries listed<br />
as Tier 1 <strong>in</strong> the current <strong>Report</strong> that were listed as<br />
Tier 2 <strong>in</strong> the 2006 <strong>Report</strong>; 2) Countries listed as Tier<br />
2 <strong>in</strong> the current <strong>Report</strong> that were listed as Tier 3 <strong>in</strong><br />
the 2006 <strong>Report</strong>; and, 3) Countries listed as Tier 2<br />
<strong>in</strong> the current <strong>Report</strong>, where:<br />
a) The absolute number of victims of severe<br />
<strong>for</strong>ms of traffick<strong>in</strong>g is very significant or<br />
is significantly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g;<br />
b) There is a failure to provide evidence of<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g ef<strong>for</strong>ts to combat severe<br />
<strong>for</strong>ms of traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> persons from the<br />
previous year, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigations, prosecutions, and<br />
convictions of traffick<strong>in</strong>g crimes,<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased assistance to victims, and<br />
decreas<strong>in</strong>g evidence of complicity <strong>in</strong><br />
severe <strong>for</strong>ms of traffick<strong>in</strong>g by government<br />
officials; or<br />
c) The determ<strong>in</strong>ation that a country is<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g significant ef<strong>for</strong>ts to br<strong>in</strong>g itself<br />
<strong>in</strong>to compliance with the m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
standards was based on commitments<br />
by the country to take additional future<br />
steps over the next year.<br />
12<br />
This third category (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a, b, and c) has<br />
been termed by the Department of State “Tier 2<br />
Watch List.” There were 32 countries placed on