08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hiccoughs*; convulsions; syncopes, leipothimies 143 and faintings;<br />

death*, tho’ very rarely, and that in very weak people; purging; a long<br />

stay thereof at stomach sometimes; stoppage of urine*; It sometimes<br />

proves dangerous after haemorrhages and large evacuations.’<br />

Thomas Bayes published ‘An Essay towards solving a problem in<br />

the doctrine of chances’. This has become the gold standard for the<br />

assessment of causality of adverse drug events (Bayes, 1763).<br />

1765 Samuel Bard (1742–1821), experimented on himself taking 1½<br />

grains of opium and checked his pulse every half to one hour and<br />

found that the rate had dropped from 71 per minute to 57 per minute,<br />

starting about an hour after taking the drug and the effect wore off<br />

about 7 hours later. He repeated the experiment on himself three<br />

times and then on three friends and six patients (Maehle, 1999).<br />

Fabre recommended much circumspection in the use of mercury,<br />

because of fear of ‘accidents orageux’: swelling of the tongue,<br />

engorgement of the salivary glands, swelling of the head, dysentery,<br />

fever, delirium and convulsions (Fabre, 1765).<br />

‘Ben Cao Gang Mu Shi’ [Supplements to compendium of materia<br />

medica] by Zhao Xue-Min. It lists 716 medical substances.<br />

‘Cowpox and Its Ability to Prevent Smallpox’ by Jon Fewster, an<br />

apothecary of Thornbury, was submitted to the Medical Society of<br />

London, but was not published (FPH RCP, 2000).<br />

1768 William Watson (1717–1787) in ‘An account of experiments,<br />

instituted with a view of ascertaining the most successful method of<br />

inoculating the smallpox’ London: J Nourse. He compared the pretreatment<br />

of children inoculated against smallpox. He made three<br />

groups as similar as possible and he measured the number of<br />

pustules or pocks and compared the means. It was not known at that<br />

time how to take into account the small number with very high pock<br />

count. The three groups were: mercury, senna plus rose syrup and<br />

no pre-treatment. One mercury patient had more pocks that the rest<br />

of the group together. This is one of the earliest studies using an<br />

untreated control group and a quantification of the results. However<br />

the largest group only contained 11 patients and it wasn’t until much<br />

larger groups were used that there was a chance of picking up type<br />

‘B’ reactions 144 (Bolyston, 2008).<br />

143 Leipothymie = lipothymy = sensation of being about to faint<br />

144 Type ‘B’ reaction = hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction (Rawlins & Thompson, 1977)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!