08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sales (Böttiger & Westerholm, 1973).<br />

Withdrawn: there is a large variation in the reasons for withdrawal/restrictions.<br />

Canada in 1963, Australia in 1965, Sweden in 1973, Norway in 1976, France,<br />

Philippines (but can be used as a last resort, 2009), UK, Yemen, USA,<br />

Zimbabwe, Colombia, Armenia and Syria in 1977, Kuwait in 1978, Italy and<br />

Demark in 1979, Saudi Arabia in 1980 (anaphylactic shock), Argentina in<br />

1981, Sudan and Bangladesh in 1982, Egypt in 1983 (anaphylactic shock),<br />

Israel in 1985, Belgium, Malaysia and Germany (prescription only) in 1987,<br />

Spain and Ghana in 1989, Netherlands in 1990, Switzerland and Sri Lanka in<br />

1992, Thailand in 1994, Nepal in 1997, Syria, Yemen and Zimbabwe in 1998,<br />

Sweden in 1999, Morocco, Armenia, Lithuania, and Colombia in 2000,<br />

Pakistan in 1988, Brazil in 2005, Bahrain, Greece, Ireland, Mexico, Peru,<br />

Singapore, India, Venezuela and Japan (injection only) in 2006, because of<br />

agranulocytosis and anaphylaxis. Banned in Vietnam and Nigeria. It was<br />

withdrawn in Sweden in 1974 due to an estimated incidence of<br />

agranulocytosis of 1 in 3000 patients (Böttiger & Westholm, 1973) and then<br />

the IAAA study put the excess risk at 1.1 cases per million for the combination<br />

of Ulm, Berlin and Barcelona, but in the combination Israel, Budapest and<br />

Hungary there was no excess risk (IAAAS, 1986) and therefore it was<br />

reintroduced in Sweden in 1995 and finally withdrawn in 1999 because of the<br />

data presented by Hedenmalm and Spigset showing a figure of 1: 1439 (CI<br />

1:850–1: 4684) (Hedenmalm & Spigset, 2002).The Ministry of Health in Brazil<br />

convened a conference in 2001 that decided that the risks of dipyrone are<br />

similar, or even lower, than of other analgesic/antipyretic drugs available on<br />

the market (Wong, 2002). Restricted in Germany in 1981 to treatment of<br />

severe pain and colic, and high fever not controlled by other drugs. HAI:<br />

banned it in 27 countries and restricted it in twelve.<br />

Availability: Metamizole is still manufactured in many countries (at least 25), e.g.<br />

Germany, France, Spain (1995), the Far East, Africa and Latin and South<br />

America (Martindale): available in France, Germany, Thailand, Brazil, Turkey,<br />

Czechoslovakia, Argentina, Finland, Hungary, Mexico, Russia, Italy, Sweden,<br />

Belgium, South Africa, Austria, Venezuela, Spain, Poland, Israel, and<br />

Hongkong. From other sources, which may not be so reliable: Romania,<br />

Brazil, Bulgaria, India, and Costa Rica (1993). Still available in Indonesia both<br />

as single drug (Pyronal) or combination with vitamins (Neurogesic) vitamins or<br />

with vitamins caffeine, chlordiazepoxide and diazepam and caffeine<br />

(Metaneuron).<br />

Drug Lifespan: 42 years<br />

Delay in recognition: 14 years<br />

Delay in regulatory action: 28 years<br />

Time span of withdrawals: 37 years

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!