08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In 1958 Garrod reported an approximate incidence of one case of aplastic<br />

anaemia per 400 cases at St Bartholomew’s hospital (Garrod, 1958).<br />

SED 1960: the sub-committee of the AMA Research Council–There were 27<br />

certain cases, 30 probable cases and 7 possible cases of agranulocytosis.<br />

US labelling had to include warnings of blood dyscrasias [topical preparations<br />

excepted]. Between 1957 and 1961 there were 138 deaths caused by the<br />

drug in California. The risk of fatal aplastic anaemia was at least 1:60,000<br />

(Smick et al., 1964) or between 1 in 40,800 and 1 in 24,500 or 13 times the<br />

background level (Wallerstein et al., 1969). Confirmation of causality came<br />

when it was shown that reversible marrow suppression could be induced by<br />

high dosage (Krakoff et al., 1975; Venning II, 1983).’Since the risk of serious<br />

chloramphenicol toxicity is so small (1:18,000 or probably less) it is of more<br />

than historical interest there are still many areas in which the benefits<br />

outweigh its risks.’ (Ruef & Blaser, 2000). The use of chloramphenicol eye<br />

drops lingered on despite a report in 1955 of a death from bone marrow<br />

aplasia resulting from the eye drops (Rosenthal and Blackman, 1965; Doona<br />

& Walsh, 1995), but it still remains on the UK market. The estimated risk<br />

increased from 1:200,000 in 1951 to 1:20,000 in 1971 a ten-fold increase.<br />

Tognoni said that chloramphenicol aplastic anaemia was rare in Southern<br />

European countries (Tognoni, 1979). In Sweden there was a steady decline in<br />

prescription of chloramphenicol after a warning was given in May 1968<br />

(Böttiger & Westerholm, 1973). Chloramphenicol is possibly carcinogenic to<br />

humans (IARC vol 50, 1990).<br />

Restrictions: there was a UK regulatory warning in 1967 (Venning II, 1983) and<br />

it was restricted to life threatening infections, particularly those caused by<br />

haemophilus influenzae and for typhoid fever; also as an ingredient in ear and<br />

eye drops (BNF, 1999). Its use was restricted in Germany and Japan<br />

(indications restricted) in 1975; Denmark and France in 1978; Philippines in<br />

1982, Egypt in 1983; Netherlands in 1984; Canada and Spain in 1985;<br />

Hungary in 1987; Ireland in 1989, because of aplastic anaemia. It remained<br />

on the USA and UK markets for Rocky Mountain Spotted fever in the former<br />

and for haemophilus influenza infections and typhoid fever in the latter. In<br />

Germany its use is restricted to cases of acute attacks of typhoid, paratyphoid<br />

or purulent meningitis. It also has strict regulations in countries like Israel and<br />

the Netherlands. In the USA the ‘detailmen continued to promote the drug as<br />

effective for a wide range of uses, resulting in widespread use of the drug for<br />

minor infections and an unnecessary toll of serious adverse reactions and<br />

death.’ (Waxman, 2003).<br />

Availability: still in wide usage including Indonesia.<br />

Drug Lifespan: 19 years<br />

Delay in recognition: approximately one year before the first papers, but then a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!