08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

cutaneous sarcoidosis, erythema multiforme, graft vs host disease,<br />

Jessner’s infiltrates, uremic pruritus. Possibly effective in Kaposi’s sarcoma,<br />

lichen planus, melanoma and pyoderma gangrenosum.<br />

Drug Lifespan: 3 years for original indications<br />

Delay in recognition: one year<br />

Delay in regulatory action: none<br />

Time span of withdrawals: 2 years<br />

Comment: during the three years after thalidomide was approved in West<br />

Germany on 1 st October 1957 and before it was submitted to the FDA on 12 th<br />

September 1960 the first case of polyneuritis was reported to the company on<br />

the 3 rd October 1959 (Sjöström & Nilsson, 1972), but Dr Burley of the Distillers<br />

Company, says that the first possible case of peripheral neuritis was reported<br />

on 10 th January 1960 and that 6 th case on 9 th August 1960 and further that the<br />

literature was modified to warn of the neuritis in September 1960 (Burley,<br />

1988). One wonders whether this difference was due to the use of different<br />

terminology. Sjöström and Nilsson said that by the end of 1960 the company<br />

had received over 100 reports of cases of severe polyneuritis. The Florence<br />

letter of 31 st December 1960 gave the FDA warning of what was to come. The<br />

drug had been by rejected by France and East Germany; the latter because of<br />

its neurotoxicity, lack of extensive animal tests and clinical investigations and<br />

inadequacy of the scientific results that were provided by the company (Shah,<br />

2001). The earlier accounts reported 5 cases (Burley, 1988), but on<br />

reintroduction that increased to 25% (Knopp et al., 1983) and a further paper<br />

suggests 50% (Amelung & Püntmann, 1966). It is, in my opinion, likely that<br />

had the company declared all the cases of peripheral neuritis as and when<br />

they occurred the drug would have been taken off the market earlier (see<br />

1961).<br />

1956 Mercury Amide HCl<br />

‘precipité blanc’ [White precipitate] or Chloramidure de mercure (Crème des 3<br />

fleurs d’orient or Any creme) [Cream from three oriental flowers]<br />

Use: depigmentation of the skin<br />

ADR: mercury poisoning in children, unborn and neonates. This particular drug<br />

was not mentioned in SED.<br />

Withdrawn: in Japan in 1969; in France and Oman in 1986; and in Canada in<br />

1997 (‘Diana de Beauté’ composed of ammoniated mercury, bismuth<br />

subnitrate and salicylic acid). It was reformulated with méquinol in France<br />

(Vidal, 2008). The AFSSAPS is unable to add any more information. Topical<br />

mercuric preparations banned in 8 countries and restricted in eight (HAI,<br />

2008).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!