08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SED 1952: no mention. A warning was given in 1956 of neurotoxicity [Worm<br />

wobble] (Combes et al., 1956). Severe neurotoxicity (Yohai and Barnett,<br />

1989) consisting of absences and atonic seizures. It also caused<br />

hypersensitivity and possible carcinogenicity. It is still considered sufficiently<br />

safe for use; although in most industrialised countries it has been abandoned,<br />

primarily because of concern about possible carcinogenicity and<br />

electroencephalographic changes (Kaddu, 2000; Parsons, 1971; Belloni,<br />

1967; Miller, 1967; Savage, 1967).<br />

SED 1960 : mention of incoordination, muscle weakness, tremors and<br />

headache<br />

SED 1963 : they had added: abnormal limb movements, myoclonus,<br />

dyskinesia and purpura.<br />

Withdrawn: in Italy in 1977, in Sweden in 1983, Denmark in 1984 (prescription<br />

control), Netherlands in 1985, Malaysia and Thailand (use severely restricted)<br />

in 1996, Armenia in 2000. It is not manufactured in the USA.<br />

Availability: in some countries where ascariasis is not endemic and where<br />

piperazine was used predominantly for the treatment of pinworm it has been<br />

withdrawn from use on the grounds that other more effective and less toxic<br />

drugs are now available. In other such countries, however, piperazine<br />

remains available in over-the-counter preparations: Canada, France, Ireland,<br />

Spain, Portugal, Belgium, Thailand, Turkey, Venezuela, Brazil, Mexico,<br />

Indonesia and South Africa (WHO, 2003). It was used in the UK for<br />

threadworms and roundworms (BNF, 1999). It is still available in India but<br />

with restrictions.<br />

Drug Lifespan: c89 years<br />

Delay in recognition: 64 years<br />

Delay in regulatory action: 25 years<br />

Time span of withdrawals: 23 years<br />

Comment: the side effects, which are dose-related only appeared after the drug<br />

was used as an antihelmintic some 64 years after its appearance on the<br />

market for the treatment of gout and this needs some explanation. Piperazine<br />

in 1894 cost 12 shillings an ounce–‘scarcely affordable for public practice’.<br />

The dose used then was 5-10 grains three times daily, which in 2008 terms<br />

would mean £17. 37 per day (Gordon, 1894), whilst the dose now for round<br />

worms is two doses of 4 G or 61. 2 grains, two weeks apart and for thread<br />

worms at a dose of 2.5 G daily for seven days. It is probable that piperazine<br />

was little used in the treatment of gout because its inefficacy, the price and the<br />

availability of colchicum. Some confirmation this is found in the lack of articles<br />

in the BMJ of this period and that there is no mention of piperazine in a book<br />

of household remedies of 1896. (Thompson et al., 1896). The potential<br />

carcinogenicity is based on the possibility that some nitrososamine may be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!