08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Unfortunately, due to severe toxicity and the deaths of some<br />

patients, digitoxin was rejected and forgotten until 1775, when it was<br />

rediscovered by William Withering.<br />

Early English Statute: (Apothecary Wares Drugs and Stuffs Act 32<br />

King Henry VIII, c40 For Physicians and their privileges) empowering<br />

physicians to appoint four inspectors of ‘Apothecary Wares, Drugs<br />

and stuffs’ (Goodall, 1684; Penn 1979).<br />

Henry VIII amalgamated the Barbers Company of London and the<br />

Guild (or fellowship) of Surgeons to form the Company of Barber-<br />

Surgeons.<br />

1541 Konrad Gessner (26 March 1516–13 December 1565) Swiss<br />

‘Enchiridion historiae plantarum’ [Handbook of the history of plants]<br />

(1541) and the ‘Catalogus plantarum de remediis secretis liber<br />

secundus’ [Book 2, the catalogue of secret plant remedies]<br />

Paracelsus–Philippus Aureolus Theofrastus Bombasto di<br />

Hohenheim (1493–1541) alias Paracelsus. ‘The Third Defence<br />

Concerning the Description of the New Receipts.’ is one of seven<br />

defences presented as replies to the accusations of Paracelsus’s<br />

enemies, published posthumously in 1564: ‘If you wish justly to<br />

explain each poison, what is there that is not poison? All things are<br />

poison, and nothing is without poison: the Dosis alone makes a thing<br />

not poison.’ [‘Alle Ding sind Gift und nichts ohn Gift; alein die Dosis<br />

macht das ein Ding kein Gift ist.’]<br />

‘Die Grosse Wundartzney’ (Greater Surgery) by Paracelsus had<br />

been translated into French by Pierre Hassard of Armentières as<br />

early as 1566 while Jacques Gohory had prepared a Compendium of<br />

Paracelsian theory the following year (Debus, Chemical Philosophy,<br />

1, pp.145-173).<br />

‘The several kinds of diseases are divided into various boughs,<br />

branches, and leaves, but yet the cure is but one: For example,<br />

Consider a Mercurial disease, and you shall find that the Mercurial<br />

Liquor does likewise pass into many branches and leaves; so ‘tis in<br />

the small pox, or pustules, all the kinds thereof are under Mercury,<br />

for the disease itself is mercurial: Some French-pox are under<br />

common Mercury: some pustules are under a metallic Mercury,<br />

some are under an ebony wood Mercury, some are under a<br />

Mercury…‘Tell me, how comes it to pass that mercury heals the<br />

French pox and the filthy scab? Why do you command the miserable<br />

sick persons to annoint themselves with quickesilver as<br />

shepherdesses grease their sheep? How happens it (I say) that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!