08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

caused by diphtheria antitoxin in 1905 (Pirquet & Scich, 1905).<br />

1893 The first recognition of hypertension as a disease entity ‘Une maladie<br />

d’hypertension arterielle’ (Huchard, 1893). A ‘hard pulse’ had been<br />

noted from the early days of Chinese medicine and in 1760<br />

Schaarsschmidt and Nicolai treated ‘spastic constrictions of the blood<br />

circulation with nitrate salts’. (Backer, 1944). And then after Hale’s<br />

discovery clinicians started to associate high blood pressure with<br />

different disorders. Treatment with sodium thiocyanate was the first<br />

treatment of ‘hypertension’ in 1900 (Esunge, 1991).<br />

1894 <strong>Introduction</strong> of anti-diphtheria serum.<br />

The Therapeutic Committee of the British Medical Association set up<br />

an inquiry regarding the importance of ill-effects following the use of<br />

antipyrin, antifebrin, and Phenacetin. The aim ‘was to ascertain the<br />

‘impression’ which any ill-effects, met with had made on the mind of the<br />

observer; in particular whether that impression was of such a kind as to<br />

prevent him using the drugs as frequently as he would otherwise have<br />

done.’ They approached the 34 BMA branches and invited them to<br />

furnish a limited list of names of members to whom an inquiry might<br />

usefully be addressed. Each doctor was told ‘There seems to be an<br />

impression that the effects are of such a character and frequency as<br />

materially to limit the usefulness of these drugs.’ They were then asked<br />

the following questions:<br />

The amount of experience you have had in the use of these drugs,<br />

whether as an antipyretic or analgesic agent.<br />

The doses you habitually give.<br />

The nature of any ill-effects you have observed.<br />

Their comparative frequency<br />

Your opinion as to their comparative importance. Do they<br />

materially limit the usefulness of the drugs?<br />

Twenty seven branches responded. The results showed that the<br />

ill-effects were strikingly infrequent and that placing them in the order<br />

their freedom from ill-effects: Phenacetin, antipyrin and antifebrin. It is<br />

easy today to criticize the methodology used, but this was one of the<br />

earliest attempts to find the ill-effects of a series of drugs.<br />

Biases: answer suggested, arbitrary choice of doctors, memory<br />

dependent, dependent on doctors’ diagnoses of ADRs. More of an<br />

opinion poll than a scientific investigation (see 1909) (Leech &<br />

Hunter, 1894).<br />

1895 Buss introduced sodium salicylate (Buss, 1895).<br />

Heinrich Koebner (1838–1904) published a study on quinine

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!