08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

otation.<br />

The lack of databases prior to 1960 meant that were very few retrospective<br />

cohort studies.<br />

4. Randomised controlled clinical trials.<br />

1. The 1944 patulin trial in the common cold of the British Medical Research<br />

Council: the doctor and the patient were blinded to the nature of the contents<br />

of each treatment bottle and to the code letter for the treatment. Special<br />

precautions were taken in addition to using four treatment codes—Q, R, S,<br />

and T. A nurse made the allocations in strict rotation in a separate room, filed<br />

the record counterfoil there, and detached the code label for the appropriate<br />

bottle (which the patient retained throughout the trial) before returning the<br />

patient to the doctor. The statisticians passed this as an effectively random<br />

concurrent allocation of patulin or control solution to the participants, but 95<br />

patients were given patulin and 85 given placebo, which suggests the<br />

allocation system was faulty.<br />

2. The 1948 MRC trial of streptomycin. The investigator allocated the<br />

treatment by means of randomisation numbers and the use of concealed<br />

envelopes.<br />

The collection of adverse events during a clinical trial for both the active group and a<br />

placebo group reveals how false the ‘adverse reactions’ frequency found in a cohort<br />

study without a control group can be. In a low dose Aspirin trial, with 22, 071<br />

patients, comparing 325 mgm Aspirin on alternate days with placebo the figure for<br />

gastrointestinal discomfort was 26.1% on Aspirin and 25.6% on placebo and for<br />

bleeding problems 27.0% for the Aspirin group and 20.4% for the placebo group.<br />

This difference was statistically significant (Physicians’ Health Study Research<br />

Group, 1989; Amery, 1994). How many patients had a bleeding problem because of<br />

Aspirin? If one used the figure obtained from the Aspirin group alone the incidence<br />

would be approximately four times higher than the incidence when the placebo<br />

group was considered in the analysis. A sub-group of clinical trials: large simple<br />

randomised controlled studies are useful for detection excess mortality due to the<br />

drug, e.g. Clofibrate v placebo (Committee of Principal Investigators, 1980),<br />

Salmeterol v Salbutamol (Castle et al., 1993). Randomised controlled clinical trials<br />

played very little part in the period covered in this book. These are useful for<br />

determining common ADRs, but rarely have sufficient numbers to detect very rare,<br />

but important ADRs.<br />

Books on the side-effects and abuse of drugs<br />

The first book dedicated only to side-effects and covering several drugs was<br />

Guérard’s thesis (55 pages) in 1862 followed by a fellow countryman’s thesis,<br />

Berenguier (59 pages) in 1874, covering dermatological effects for 12 and 7 drugs<br />

respectively. This presaged the first major book covering all major drugs and all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!