08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

must be due to some recently introduced substance, and they wrote<br />

around to a number of other hospitals in Germany. Most of them<br />

reported the same thing, that they had had an increase in this very<br />

unusual adverse effect. They then thought they would find out the<br />

experience of other countries where thalidomide had been used.<br />

Most of them had indeed seen this increase. They were thrown off,<br />

ironically, because they were under the impression that the drug was<br />

released in the United States. The promotional material said it was<br />

widely used in North America, and it had of course been marketed in<br />

Canada. They wrote to three centres in the U.S. where statistics<br />

were kept on birth defects. There wasn’t really any indication of an<br />

increase. This is, sadly enough, what put them off the scent. It wasn’t<br />

until November of 1961 that Lenz discovered the association. Now,<br />

the first report of phocomelia was announced at the end of<br />

November of 1961. The company immediately phoned us, and told<br />

us the news, and said they didn’t really believe it, but as a precaution<br />

they would put a halt to clinical studies going on in this country. But<br />

they did want to continue some that they had just started on its<br />

possible usefulness in cancer. That seemed no great problem to us,<br />

the benefit/risk ratio being entirely different. In March, early March of<br />

1962, they told us they were withdrawing the application<br />

immediately, as they believed there may be some truth to this<br />

association. There were some weird differences in wording of their<br />

two communications that led us to think it might have been more<br />

widely used in this country than we had gathered from the new drug<br />

application, so we asked for a complete list of the doctors they had<br />

sent the drug to, and were very surprised to find that actually over<br />

1,000 doctors had been given the drug. Most of these were recruited<br />

after the application had been submitted in September, in the<br />

expectation that it would be rapidly approved. They were told, in<br />

essence, “Don’t really worry about recording the results. We just<br />

want you to try it out, and see if you want to use it in your patients.”<br />

We then visited, or had the company visit, every one of these<br />

doctors, and pick up what remaining stocks they had -- and there<br />

were indeed quite a lot -- and find out if they had had any phocomelic<br />

or abnormal births amongst the patients they had given the drug to.<br />

In all, we found about 10 or 11 cases that we thought might be due to<br />

the trials in this country. There were an additional seven patients or<br />

subjects where it was clear that the drug had been gotten from a<br />

foreign source. Now, the thalidomide tragedy in Europe actually<br />

didn’t cause a great stir at the time in this country because there

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!