08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

several symptoms. Renal damage and liver damage referring to biochemical<br />

evidence and, therefore, not available at that time; but why no mention of<br />

conjunctivitis? The word conjunctivitis was used in the 17 th century and its presence<br />

would have been obvious, but it might only be caused by elemental mercury.<br />

Perhaps compared with the other side-effects minor inconveniencies were not<br />

deemed important. One of mercury’s effects, e.g. diarrhoea has an unexpected<br />

beneficial effect in that it clears the bowel of any retained mercury and thereby<br />

prevents further absorption and its inherent toxicity. The increased urine first noted<br />

in 1737 was re-discovered in 1919 by Alfred Vogl with Novasurol and henceforth<br />

was used as a diuretic (Vogl, 1950). In 1924 Mersalyl was discovered and became<br />

the main drug used to produce diuresis.<br />

Quicksilver is barely absorbed during its passage through the gut with the result<br />

that it collects just above the anal sphincter and if the tone of the sphincter is relaxed<br />

for a moment a spray of glistening globules is seen on the floor. ‘During a dance at a<br />

public assembly a lady was thought to have dropped her pearls, but when her escort<br />

went to pick them up he found, much to the lady’s confusion, that they were<br />

globules of mercury.’ (Abraham, 1948).<br />

The monstrous adverse drug reactions of mercury must be balanced by its<br />

efficacy. Although the treating physicians and surgeons believed that it cured<br />

syphilis they may have been mistaken, since there was a spontaneous resolution of<br />

both primary and secondary syphilis. The course of untreated syphilis had been<br />

investigated in a study in Oslo (1891–1951) which had 1,978 patients and, more<br />

recently, in the unethical Tuskegee study in American male negroes 175 (1932–1972).<br />

The primary chancre resolved in 2–6 weeks and the secondary stage developed<br />

about 6 weeks after the healing of the primary lesion and consisted of a generalised<br />

rash, headaches, fever, malaise, joint and muscle aches and more rarely alopecia,<br />

laryngitis, hepatitis, nephrotic syndrome, bone pain and uveitis. All these resolved<br />

spontaneously. During the period prior to the tertiary phase the syphilis was latent<br />

and in about 60% it remained latent for the remainder of the patient’s life. The<br />

tertiary lesions included: cutaneous gummas, mucosal gummas, bone syphilis,<br />

visceral syphilis (liver, eyes, stomach, lungs, testis, haemolytic anaemia) and<br />

neurosyphilis (Wright & Csonka, 1996). The doctors may well have mistaken the<br />

spontaneous resolution of the primary and secondary phases, and the latency of the<br />

third phase as being due to mercury treatment. Since the disease remained latent<br />

how can one tell when a cure occurs? This differentiation only became possible<br />

when a laboratory test, the Wasserman reaction, was discovered in 1906. The tests<br />

have increased in their sophistication since then. It was in 1905 that the discovery of<br />

175 Tuskegee Study. 399 poor male negroes and 201 healthy controls were followed up for 40 years. 28 died<br />

from syphilis,100 died from conditions related to their syphilis, 28 wives were infected and 19 children had<br />

congenital syphilis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!