08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eporting (Griffin & Weber, 1986), based on the hypothesis that Catholics tend to<br />

accept ‘authority’ more easily and that Catholic members of the medical profession<br />

are more paternalistic. In this survey there seems not to be a religious bias as far as<br />

withdrawing drugs is concerned.<br />

Curiosities<br />

Bismuth: Egypt and Japan were the first to withdraw it, but the problem first<br />

struck Australia and France.<br />

Phenacetin: First noted in watchmakers in Switzerland, but withdrawn first in<br />

Finland because of nephropathy.<br />

Phenolpthalein: Norway and Yemen, but carcinogenicity found in the USA.<br />

Thiomersal: First withdrawn in Malaysia in 1995, but it became controversial in<br />

the mid 1990s when it was suggested that it caused autism and the USA undertook<br />

extensive research and although the findings were negative advocated stopping its<br />

use in vaccines.<br />

Phenylbutazone: First withdrawn in Jordan and Bangladesh, first reports in UK.<br />

Tetracycline Paediatric: First withdrawn in Jordan and Peru.<br />

Oxyphenisatin: First withdrawn in Cuba at the time of the first confirmed report.<br />

Phenformin: First withdrawn in Turkey, but problem known for eleven years.<br />

Drug Withdrawals<br />

Figure 13. Withdrawal times (Lifespan) from first approval/mention to withdrawal or restriction<br />

3453 BC–1880 AD median = 1431 years (6 drugs) range 100-3453 years<br />

1880–1900 median = 72.5 years (6 Drugs) range 40–100 years<br />

1900–1930 median = 69 years (6 drugs) range 28–83 years

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!