08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SED 1960 and SED 1963: no mention of ADRs<br />

Withdrawn: in Germany, Italy, Singapore, Hongkong, Domenica, France, UK,<br />

USA and Canada in 1979; Australia, Egypt, Brazil, Panama and Philippines in<br />

1980; Argentina in 1981; India in 1983; Oman in 1992; and also withdrawn in<br />

Chile, New Zealand and Venezuela. HAI: banned in 19 countries.<br />

Availability: on the internet<br />

Drug Lifespan: 32 years<br />

Delay in recognition: 32 years<br />

Delay in regulatory action: Nil<br />

Time span of withdrawals: 13 years<br />

Comment: if a drug is left on the market for specific indications it is impossible to<br />

police the generalised use in poorer countries.<br />

1948 Chloramphenicol (Chloromycetin)<br />

Was approved in the US on 12 th January 1949 and introduced in the UK in<br />

August 1949.<br />

Use: an antibiotic, which was originally tested for scrub typhus and now used for<br />

typhoid, salmonella, meningitis and rickettsial infections (Sneader, 2005).<br />

ADR: the presence of the nitrobenzene radical in the structure of<br />

chloramphenicol led to the suspicion that the drug might be toxic to the<br />

haemopoietic system (Smadel, 1949). Three patients showed marrow<br />

hypoplasia after chloramphenicol with a positive dechallenge (Volini et al.,<br />

1949). The first confirmation of this hypothesis was a single fatal case of<br />

aplastic anaemia reported in 1950 (Rich et al., 1950) followed in 1952 by a<br />

paper, authored by FDA staff, saying, ‘it appears beyond a reasonable doubt<br />

that chloramphenicol, in certain susceptible individuals, causes blood<br />

dyscrasias, including aplastic anaemia, thrombocytopenic purpura,<br />

granulocytopenia and pancytopenia.’ This paper gave details of 19 articles on<br />

the subject between 1949 and August 1952. The authors recommended a<br />

change in labelling and that the drug should not used for minor infections<br />

(Lewis et al., 1952). ‘In 1952 when it was realised that chloramphenicol had<br />

caused scores of cases of aplastic anaemia and that it had taken three years<br />

to appreciate the potential toxicity of the drug’. (Doll, 1969). In June 1952 the<br />

number of cases of blood disorders associated with chloramphicol in the US<br />

was 410, but in only 61 cases was the drug the only drug being taken. It was<br />

suggested that a case control study should be undertaken but nothing was<br />

done. The main problem, which is true with many drugs, was that doctors<br />

misuse and over use antibiotics.<br />

(Marks, http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/histmed/images/hmadverse.pdf;<br />

Maeder, 1994).<br />

SED 1952: mentioned aplastic anaemia (12 cases) and agranulocytosis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!