08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eported in Australia as early as the 1880s. The report reads: ‘The<br />

disease is observed in girls aged 18 months to three and a half<br />

years. It is characterized by sadness, anxiety, and eventually a<br />

progressive loss of language, with psychiatric symptoms<br />

(hallucinations, coprophagy, delirium during sleep, etc). In addition,<br />

there are sweats and their consequences: viscous, humid skin,<br />

swollen, red and cold hands and feet. The patients feel cold and<br />

permanently irritated. They complain of being itchy, lose their hair<br />

primarily at the temples, but sometimes to the point of complete<br />

baldness. Almost certainly infection of the nail cuticles and<br />

abscesses follow. Internal organs are not affected.’ An association<br />

between mercury and Pink disease (infantile acrodynia) was<br />

suggested by the work of Warkany and Hubbard (1948, 1951),<br />

Fanconi et al (1947) and Fanconi and Botsztejn (1948). In 38 of 41<br />

investigated cases Warkany and Hubbard found an abnormal<br />

quantity of mercury excreted in the urine. Then in 1945 a severely<br />

affected child was admitted to hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio, under the<br />

care of Dr Josef Warkany. The disease was rare in Cincinnati and<br />

Warkany’s interest was aroused. He had a hunch that heavy metal<br />

poisoning might be implicated, so he asked his laboratory to<br />

measure the levels of the common, industrial heavy metals in the<br />

child’s urine. The results were all negative. But one elementmercury-had<br />

not been measured, as there was no adequate test for<br />

it at the time. By luck, Warkany discovered that in Cincinnati there<br />

was a young chemist, Mr Donald Hubbard, who had recently<br />

developed a sensitive method for measuring urinary mercury, so for<br />

the sake of completeness he asked Hubbard to do the measurement<br />

on his patient. The result was strongly positive (Thiele, 2006).<br />

Mercury in the urine doesn’t prove causality, just an association; it<br />

could be due to protopathic bias where early fever due to a virus<br />

infection could be mistaken for teething (fever, flushed cheeks,<br />

peevish, disturbed sleep, lower jaw moved from side to side) hence<br />

the giving of a mercury (calomel) containing teething powder<br />

(Thomson, Steele & Reid, 1896).<br />

In 1947 there was the recognition that mercury in teething and<br />

worming powders caused Pink disease (Black, 1990). However in a<br />

standard textbook on children’s diseases 1954 said ‘Common<br />

disease of unknown aetiology’ giving four theories of causality –<br />

vitamin deficiency, neurotrophic virus infection, chronic mercury<br />

poisoning and salt-deficiency’. By 1953 mercury had been banned<br />

from teething powders in parts of Australia. Since the 1950s the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!