08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SED 1960: addiction frequently observed with withdrawal symptoms. Other<br />

overdose ADRs were: respiratory depression, hypotension, pulmonary<br />

oedema, cerebral oedema, convulsions and sudden apnoea (BMJ Leader,<br />

1976). The mortality from overdosage was 13.9% for glutethimide against<br />

0.7% for barbiturates (Holland et al., 1975).<br />

Withdrawn: its addiction liability and severity of withdrawal symptoms are equal<br />

to those of the barbiturates and it is controlled under Schedule III of the 1971<br />

Convention on Psychotropic Substances in UK. Withdrawn in Norway in 1980,<br />

Zimbabwe in 1984, Pakistan in 1988, USA and France in 1991. Changed to<br />

Schedule II in USA 1955.<br />

Availability: not known<br />

Drug Lifespan: 17 years.<br />

Delay in recognition: 3 years<br />

Delay in regulatory action: 26 years<br />

Time span of withdrawals: 11 years<br />

Comment: wide variation in times to regulatory action probably reflects differing<br />

responses to drug dependence.<br />

1955 Oxyphenisatin (Veripaque, Lavema, Noloc, Dialose, Protab)<br />

<strong>Introduction</strong> first described in 1925. Dialose Plus consisted of: dioctyl sodium<br />

sulfosuccinate, carboxymethylcellulose sodium and oxyphenisatin acetate.<br />

Use: a laxative<br />

ADR: chronic active hepatitis and cytolytic hepatitis. Mentioned in Physicians’<br />

Desk Reference, 23 rd edition 1969 as idiosyncratic jaundice. The first case<br />

with a positive rechallenge was in 1970 (McHardy & Balart, 1970; Reynolds<br />

et al., 1970). Adequate animal toxicity studies had not been done. ‘The<br />

sudden recognition of an association between an obvious symptom–<br />

jaundice- and compounds such as …oxyphenisatin … which were said to<br />

have been widely available for many years, was puzzling. This suggested<br />

either a sudden increase in the usage of the drug and, therefore, in the<br />

incidence of the reaction leading to its recognition or alternatively, recent<br />

changes in formulation affecting toxicity.’ Investigations did not reveal any<br />

formulation factor (ADEC, 1972).<br />

SED 1964, SED 1966, SED 1968: no mention<br />

SED 1984: despite the withdrawal of oxyphenisatin in many areas chronic<br />

active hepatitis occurs from time to time as a result of its continued use.<br />

Withdrawn: in Cuba in 1970; Australia and Japan in 1972; USA in 1973; Norway<br />

in 1974; Denmark in 1975; Germany and Italy in 1976; Austria in 1977; the UK<br />

and Canada in 1978; France in 1979, which was prompted by a French report<br />

of six cases of chronic hepatitis (Delchier et al., 1979); Kuwait in 1980;<br />

Belgium in 1981; Mauritius in 1982; Spain, Cyprus, Netherlands, New Zealand

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!