08.05.2014 Views

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

Introduction - Uppsala Monitoring Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Crofton, 2009). Asthma, pancytopenia, aplastic anaemia, haemolytic anaemia,<br />

Stevens-Johnson syndrome, peripheral neuritis, encephalopathy, neuromuscular<br />

block, anosmia and loss of concentration were all discovered after 1957 suggesting<br />

that they might be very rare. Fiedler’s myocarditis was probably a single case<br />

(Chatterjee & Thakre, 1958). The case series prior to 1948 seem to have been<br />

effective in discovering the commoner ADRs.<br />

Of those ADR mentioned in SED 2000:<br />

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. The original description was given in 1922<br />

(Stevens and Johnson, 1922) George Orwell probably suffered it as an ADR to<br />

Streptomycin in 1947. There was a single case published in 1982 (Sarker et al.,<br />

1982) A case of toxic erythema with generalising follicular pustules with a positive<br />

rechallenge appeared in 1981 (Shimoto & Aoki, 1981).<br />

Anosmia. A survey of 300 patients found 8 cases of anosmia and 13 cases of<br />

hyposmia, but all but two had had anosmia before streptomycin (Kereković &<br />

Curkević, 1971) an allusion to 5 case of olfactory disturbance was made in 2003<br />

(Welge-Luessen & Wolfensberaed, 2003).<br />

Haemolytic anaemia. A single case of immune haemolytic anaemia and renal<br />

failure was reported in 1977 (Martinez-L et al., 1977) and a similar case in 1962<br />

(Nachman et al., 1962).<br />

Peripheral neuritis. First reported in 1971 (Herishahy & Tauste, 1971).<br />

The small number of patients involved in these late reported cases suggests that<br />

they are rare and that their discovery probably resulted from the large number of<br />

patients treated over the years. Most of the ADRs were discovered via individual<br />

reports or small case series and the MRC Trial added little to our knowledge of the<br />

ADRs. In the USA where they had started with individual cases and case series the<br />

dramatic improvements meant that controlled studies would be unethical, but the<br />

dramatic improvement only became clear after a controlled study had started and<br />

since there was sufficient drug available to treat patients the placebo control study<br />

was unethical and was stopped. The situation was different in the UK as there was<br />

insufficient drug to treat all the patients so a placebo group was ethical (Green,<br />

1954). Streptomycin was more vestibule-toxic than dihydrostreptomycin, but this<br />

was frequently reversible. Di-hydrostreptomycin was more cochleo-toxic and the<br />

resulting deafness was nearly always permanent. The advent of streptomycin made<br />

little difference to the already declining death rate of tuberculosis (McKeown, 1976).<br />

Discussion on Part Two<br />

First we will take a look at the amount of knowledge that we have on single<br />

representative ADR for each marker drug.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!