24.10.2014 Views

MOSAIC - The training kit for Euro-Mediterranean youth work

MOSAIC - The training kit for Euro-Mediterranean youth work

MOSAIC - The training kit for Euro-Mediterranean youth work

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

306<br />

Explain that the in<strong>for</strong>mation should be as concrete and as detailed as possible:<br />

<strong>for</strong> each case, participants should try to explain what was the cause of the suffering<br />

and they should attempt to give (rough) statistical in<strong>for</strong>mation. Give them<br />

15 minutes to think about this.<br />

Invite people to get into pairs or small groups to share their in<strong>for</strong>mation with<br />

others. Ask them to try to assess their own in<strong>for</strong>mation and that provided by<br />

others in terms of the following questions:<br />

– To what extent do you think the in<strong>for</strong>mation is balanced? Would the other<br />

side in the conflict agree?<br />

Bring everyone together to share the results of the discussions.<br />

Debriefing and evaluation<br />

Ask each group in turn to share briefly the results of their discussion, but explain that<br />

the plenary discussion that follows will then try to focus on the way people think<br />

about conflict, rather than on the details of specific conflicts.<br />

Do you think that you and others in your group managed to give a fair and<br />

objective representation of the conflicts?<br />

Did you manage to recall any statistics? If so, were these statistics from both<br />

sides of the conflict or did they mostly record victims from your side?<br />

What type of reasons did you give <strong>for</strong> particular acts of hostility? Did the reasons<br />

differ if the hostile acts were carried out by your side?<br />

Did you represent hostile acts committed by your side as any ‘more justified’<br />

than those committed by the other side? If so, why do you think this was the<br />

case?<br />

Did you notice any similarities or differences between the way you represented<br />

your conflict and the way others represented theirs?<br />

Can you draw any conclusions about the way that conflict is perceived and<br />

remembered? What are the main influences that shape our perceptions or<br />

memory of a conflict?<br />

Did you feel you needed more in<strong>for</strong>mation? Where did most of your in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

come from? Do you think this is a reliable source?<br />

Can you imagine that more in<strong>for</strong>mation might alter your view of this conflict?<br />

Can you draw any similarities with on-going conflicts in the <strong>Euro</strong>-<strong>Mediterranean</strong><br />

area?<br />

Did you learn anything about yourself in this activity?<br />

At the end, invite anyone who wants to share their feelings about the activity as a<br />

whole. Ask them whether they found it difficult/ useful/ challenging/ upsetting.<br />

Tips <strong>for</strong> the facilitator<br />

This activity could provoke very strong feelings and you need to be aware<br />

whether there are likely to be participants in the group who come from different<br />

sides of a particular conflict. You should be prepared to deal with any potential<br />

conflict that might arise.<br />

<strong>MOSAIC</strong> - <strong>The</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>kit</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Euro</strong>-<strong>Mediterranean</strong> <strong>youth</strong> <strong>work</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!