24.10.2014 Views

MOSAIC - The training kit for Euro-Mediterranean youth work

MOSAIC - The training kit for Euro-Mediterranean youth work

MOSAIC - The training kit for Euro-Mediterranean youth work

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3<br />

335<br />

Depending on how com<strong>for</strong>table the participants feel with one another, try to<br />

create variety when breaking them into small groups, <strong>for</strong> example, by mixing<br />

<strong>Euro</strong>pean and <strong>Mediterranean</strong> participants, northern and southern participants,<br />

minority and majority representatives (if this distinction can be drawn at all).<br />

However, you should be sensitive to the possibility that there may be groups or<br />

individuals who will feel uncom<strong>for</strong>table discussing these issues with some people<br />

in the group. In such a case, try to create “safe” groups to begin with.<br />

You may want to give participants a list of specific issues to address in the small<br />

groups. For example:<br />

– How do the eight characteristics chosen by people in your group compare<br />

from one person, or one region, to another?<br />

– How did you go about selecting the parts of your identity that were more or<br />

less important?<br />

– How do the single characteristics differ from one person or one region to<br />

another?<br />

– Are you surprised by any of the choices made by other participants?<br />

You may want to ask groups to appoint a rapporteur to present the main issues<br />

discussed in the small groups. Try not to let the presentations be too detailed or<br />

too long: ask simply <strong>for</strong> a summary of the main discussions.<br />

Bear in mind that majority-group identities often feature personality traits, such as<br />

being amusing, generous, warm-hearted and the like. In contrast, minority-group<br />

identities and groups perceived to be “lower” in status tend to feature things like<br />

nationality, gender, race and so on. One way to understand this is that majority<br />

groups are often unaware of certain aspects of their identities because these are<br />

perceived to be the norm. In a dominant white society, <strong>for</strong> example, white people<br />

rarely think about being white, while black people have no choice but to think<br />

about being black.<br />

You could explore some of these issues by asking the group to compare the selected<br />

characteristics from minority/majority groups and asking members of each group the<br />

reasons <strong>for</strong> their selection: why they included or omitted such things as skin colour,<br />

gender or nationality as elements of their core identity, <strong>for</strong> example.<br />

Variations<br />

Carry out the activity the other way round! Start by asking participants to select one<br />

key characteristic, and then build up gradually to create a fuller sense of identity,<br />

consisting of eight (or more) characteristics. This may be a more com<strong>for</strong>table option<br />

to use with groups that could feel insecure about “losing” elements of their identity.<br />

Discussion can then centre around points of similarity between different individuals<br />

or groups.<br />

Ideas <strong>for</strong> action<br />

Find out which minority groups are living in your neighbourhood and organise a<br />

cultural evening involving as many of them as possible.<br />

Lose yourself

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!