24.10.2014 Views

MOSAIC - The training kit for Euro-Mediterranean youth work

MOSAIC - The training kit for Euro-Mediterranean youth work

MOSAIC - The training kit for Euro-Mediterranean youth work

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3<br />

317<br />

At the end of the debate, ask everyone, including the speakers, to make a final decision<br />

and stand by whichever sign best represents their own position. Ask them to look<br />

around and make a note of where most people are standing, then invite everyone<br />

back to the circle <strong>for</strong> the debriefing.<br />

Debriefing and evaluation<br />

Participants may want to go on discussing the issue of the debate. Allow anyone who<br />

wants to the opportunity to do so, but try to keep this brief, so that the whole group<br />

can debrief the activity as a whole.<br />

What are your impressions of the debate? What did you like or dislike about the<br />

process?<br />

Did you find the discussion useful and did it change anyone’s opinion on the issue?<br />

Which arguments did you find most convincing and why?<br />

How much were you influenced by the arguments themselves, and how much<br />

did other factors play a part? (For example, the group you were in first, the people<br />

who were speaking, the rhetorical skills of the speakers)<br />

Was it difficult to select one position at the end? What made the choice difficult<br />

or easy?<br />

What relation does this issue have with human rights? Did the debate help you<br />

to understand human rights issues any differently?<br />

Do you think that regional factors played any part in the way people voted<br />

at the end? Is this issue viewed any differently in different parts of the <strong>Euro</strong>-<br />

<strong>Mediterranean</strong> region?<br />

Do you think that young people view this issue any differently from other members<br />

of the population? If so, what might be the reasons <strong>for</strong> this?<br />

Would you like to have had more in<strong>for</strong>mation on anything discussed in this<br />

debate? (Here you could draw up a list of issues that participants would like to<br />

pursue further.)<br />

Tips <strong>for</strong> the facilitator<br />

You could get the group to decide which of the motions they would find most interesting<br />

to discuss, or make the choice be<strong>for</strong>ehand. Write up the motion, when the decision<br />

has been made, so that everyone can see it.<br />

Make sure that everyone understands the amount of time there will be available<br />

<strong>for</strong> speeches and that the Chair will take a strict view of speakers who exceed<br />

their time limit! Emphasise to the groups that they should help the speakers<br />

prepare the speeches since they will be putting the group’s position in the debate.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y could start by making a list of all the arguments they want to make and then<br />

dividing them between the two speakers.<br />

You may wish to give groups copies of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights<br />

(UDHR) or at least of the relevant rights <strong>for</strong> the debate.<br />

Check that the two ‘opposition’ groups understand that they need to propose<br />

amendments to the motion. You may want to ask them to let the Chair know<br />

these be<strong>for</strong>e the start of the debate, and write them up so that they are visible<br />

For and against the motion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!