05.11.2014 Views

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 4 STUDY SI TE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURVEY<br />

RESULTS<br />

STUDY SITE CHARACTERISTICS<br />

The 13 study cities in the National Multiple Family Submetering <strong>and</strong> Allocation Billing<br />

Program Study were located in six distinct regions of North America.<br />

1) West Coast– San Diego, Oakl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Irvine, California.<br />

2) Southwest – Phoenix <strong>and</strong> Tucson, Arizona; Las Vegas, Nevada; Austin <strong>and</strong> San<br />

Antonio, Texas.<br />

3) Northwest – Seattle, Washington <strong>and</strong> Portl<strong>and</strong>, Oregon<br />

4) Mountain –Denver, Colorado.<br />

5) Midwest – Indianapolis, Indiana.<br />

6) Southeast – Hillsborough County, Florida.<br />

Even study sites that were in close geographic proximity had unique characteristics,<br />

ranging from price of water to recent conservation efforts to specific building features. Multi<strong>family</strong><br />

homes in these study sites also differed in their water consumption patterns. This section<br />

compares some of the service area characteristics for the 13 Study sites. Even within each study<br />

site there was tremendous variability in the size, l<strong>and</strong>scape, level of maintenance, <strong>and</strong> appearance<br />

of the participating properties.<br />

Water <strong>and</strong> Wastewater Rates<br />

Water <strong>and</strong> wastewater rates, as well as rate structures, varied tremendously in the 13<br />

participating study sites. Most utilities had either an increasing block rate structure or a uniform<br />

rate structure for multi-<strong>family</strong> housing. Indianapolis was the only participant using a declining<br />

block rate structure. Water <strong>and</strong> wastewater rates per kgal are shown in Table 4.1. All rates are<br />

adjusted to kgal. Multi-tiered water rates are averaged as shown in the table. The goal was to<br />

identify a single cost per kgal for water <strong>and</strong> wastewater for all utilities in the study. In practice,<br />

the wastewater charge frequently appears as a fixed charge on a monthly bill, <strong>and</strong> it is typically<br />

calculated from winter-time consumption, which justifies its inclusion in the commodity charge.<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!