05.11.2014 Views

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 2 LITERAT URE REVIEW<br />

As the population continues to grow, measures must be taken to ensure there is adequate<br />

water supply to meet current <strong>and</strong> future dem<strong>and</strong>. The capital investment, environmental<br />

concerns, <strong>and</strong> regulatory obstacles inherent in the development of new water supplies often make<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> side management an attractive option. But what are the best <strong>and</strong> most effective<br />

measures to curb the use of such an essential commodity as water? Economists typically<br />

advocate the use of price while engineers typically advocate the use of efficient technology. In<br />

fact, the union of the two ideas is the premise upon which <strong>submetering</strong> <strong>and</strong> ratio utility <strong>billing</strong><br />

systems (RUBS) are based. The extent to which pricing <strong>and</strong> efficient technology are effective<br />

continues to be studied. This literature review begins with an examination of the role of price in<br />

water consumption, moves to metering, <strong>and</strong> finally takes a look at the effect of current <strong>billing</strong><br />

methods on multi-<strong>family</strong> water use.<br />

PRICE AND WATER DEMAND<br />

The relationship between the retail price of water <strong>and</strong> consumption has been explored<br />

extensively because of its implications for water planners <strong>and</strong> providers. Basic economics<br />

assumes water price <strong>and</strong> consumption are inversely related, <strong>and</strong> a convenient way to quantify the<br />

relationship is through price elasticity. Elasticity is defined as the percentage change in quantity<br />

consumed for each percent change in price. An elasticity of one implies that a one percent<br />

change in price results in a one percent decline in quantity consumed. Price elasticity measures<br />

the sensitivity of water use relative to changes in the price of water, after controlling for various<br />

influential factors such as weather <strong>and</strong> income (AWWA 2000). In general, the price elasticity of<br />

water is negative because theoretically, as the price of water increases, water use decreases. A<br />

price elasticity with an absolute value between zero <strong>and</strong> one is considered inelastic, or relatively<br />

unresponsive to rate change. An absolute value greater than one is considered elastic. A<br />

product’s elasticity depends on how many uses it has, the quantity <strong>and</strong> availability of its<br />

substitutes, <strong>and</strong> its relative importance within the consumer’s overall budget (Schlette <strong>and</strong> Kemp<br />

1991). Numerous studies have been conducted on this topic <strong>and</strong> a summary of some of the more<br />

relevant studies can be seen in Table 2.1.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!