05.11.2014 Views

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Indoor Water Use per Unit in 2001 Indoor Water Use per Unit in 2002<br />

Property Characteristic<br />

Mean<br />

(kgal)<br />

Std.<br />

Dev. N<br />

P-<br />

Value *<br />

Mean<br />

(kgal)<br />

Std.<br />

Dev. N<br />

Government<br />

subsidized<br />

52.30 26.90 N=88 55.00 31.40 N=76<br />

How is the Private rental 52.00 24.90 N=710 52.00 26.80 N=611<br />

property<br />

Condominium 50.30 24.90 N=170 0.940 51.00 27.20 N=167<br />

classified? Privt. resident<br />

owned<br />

50.60 29.40 N=99 51.50 28.10 N=90<br />

Other 52.10 24.90 N=43<br />

48.50 21.10 N=42<br />

How is the Non-Rental 50.7 26.3 N=312 50.8 26.6 N=299<br />

property<br />

.433<br />

Rental 52.0 25.1 N=798<br />

classified?<br />

52.3 27.4 N=687<br />

Sauna/steam room<br />

no 51.50 25.50 N=1060 52.00 27.40 N=936<br />

0.947<br />

yes 51.70 25.50 N=103 50.40 25.90 N=97<br />

Spa/hot tub<br />

no 51.50 25.70 N=897<br />

0.948<br />

51.90 28.20 N=778<br />

yes 51.60 24.70 N=266<br />

51.60 24.20 N=255<br />

* Derived from an ANOVA test, indicates the probability of seeing a result as or more extreme than that seen in the<br />

sample. Factors with p-values less than 0.05 were considered “statistically significant,” meaning that if there were<br />

no difference, the probability of seeing a result as or more extreme than that seen in the sample was less than 5%.<br />

P-<br />

Value *<br />

0.755<br />

.410<br />

0.579<br />

0.878<br />

Continuous Variables<br />

Continuous variables such as the average number of bedrooms per unit <strong>and</strong> average rent<br />

per bedroom could not be examined using ANOVA techniques so Pearson Correlation analysis<br />

was used. The results from this analysis examining the impacts of the continuous variables from<br />

the manager survey on per unit water use are shown in Table 5.13.<br />

The Pearson product moment coefficient of correlation is a measure of the strength of the<br />

linear relationship between two variables - in this case property characteristics measured on a<br />

continuous scale from the manager survey <strong>and</strong> average water use per unit per year (McClave, et.<br />

al., 1997). In Table 5.13, the Pearson Correlation value is a number between –1 <strong>and</strong> 1 where a<br />

value close to zero indicates that there is no correlation. The hypothesis is that the Pearson<br />

Correlation is equal to zero, hence a p-value of 0.05 or less indicates that there is a less than 5%<br />

chance that a correlation as or more extreme than the one observed could have occurred if there<br />

were no relationship between the variables. All of the calculations assume that normal<br />

approximations hold so that the lack of a linear relationship is equivalent to independence.<br />

Again the dark line in Table 5.13 indicates the break point for statistically significant factors<br />

selected for inclusion in <strong>multiple</strong> linear regression models.<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!