05.11.2014 Views

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The second part of the visit required that the team gain access into a sample of dwelling<br />

units to verify the plumbing fixtures. For obvious reasons of privacy <strong>and</strong> required notification,<br />

the team was typically only allowed access into vacant units. The initial goal was to visit about<br />

10% of the total units on the property. In some cases this was possible, but often there were not<br />

enough vacant units available to visit, in which case the auditor would simply visit as many units<br />

as was possible.<br />

During each unit visit, the auditor tested <strong>and</strong> recorded the flow rates of every faucet <strong>and</strong><br />

showerhead in the dwelling unit using a Niagara flow bag. Then each toilet was carefully<br />

inspected to determine if it was a rated ultra low-flow (ULF) toilet. Some low-flow toilets have<br />

“1.6 gpf” stamped right on the porcelain, but many do not. For the remaining toilets, the toilet<br />

lid was removed <strong>and</strong> the date stamp (found either on the inside of the lid or inside on the side of<br />

the tank) was noted. Any toilet with a date of 1994 or later was deemed a low flow toilet. The<br />

make <strong>and</strong> model of the toilet was also recorded. The site visit team also noted any leaks in the<br />

unit (i.e. leaky shower diverter, leaky toilet flapper, dripping faucet, etc). Next, the team noted<br />

whether or not the unit came with clothes washer hook-ups. If the unit came with a clothes<br />

washer, the make <strong>and</strong> model was noted. If the property had any central laundry facilities, these<br />

were also visited, <strong>and</strong> the appropriate information was recorded on the site visit protocol. Figure<br />

3.3 illustrates some of the tasks performed during the r<strong>and</strong>om unit site visits.<br />

Figure 3.3 From left to right: a site auditor testing the faucet flow rate, inspecting the toilet<br />

lid for a date stamp, <strong>and</strong> testing the shower flow rate.<br />

The original goal was to visit 80 properties <strong>and</strong> have 40 matched pairs (20 submetered<br />

<strong>and</strong> 20 RUBS) for analysis. A total of 77 site visits were completed <strong>and</strong> 64 of these were usable<br />

matched on.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!