05.11.2014 Views

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28% of those from RUBS properties. About a third (36%) of those who lived in<br />

utility-submetered units said the <strong>billing</strong> method influenced their household’s water consumption.<br />

Experience with Water Billing<br />

Many respondents to the resident survey were confused or mistaken about how they paid<br />

for water. Residents were asked to identify the method by which they were billed for water.<br />

Table 4.16 displays the responses of the residents, organized by the category of water <strong>billing</strong><br />

method as identified by the owners or managers of the properties. Overall, 14% admitted they<br />

didn’t know how they were billed. Among those whose water is included the rent or resident<br />

dues, 85% correctly identified their water <strong>billing</strong> method. Only 57% of residents in submetered<br />

properties did so, 44% of those in RUBS properties, <strong>and</strong> 25% of those in hot water hybrid<br />

properties.<br />

Table 4.16 Reported water <strong>billing</strong> method, resident survey respondents<br />

Hot<br />

water<br />

hybrid<br />

Utilitysubmetered*<br />

How are you billed for water<br />

usage at this property?<br />

In-rent<br />

or HOA Submetered RUBS<br />

Total<br />

included in rent or in HOA dues 85.2% 11.3% 25.1% 8.7% 0.0% 39.9%<br />

based amount of hot water used .4% 4.4% 3.3% 25.0% 0.0% 3.3%<br />

individual water meters; charged<br />

1.0% 55.6% 7.8% 29.3% 0.0% 14.2%<br />

for individual water usage<br />

calculated on square footage 0.1% 1.3% 8.0% 2.2% 0.0% 3.8%<br />

calculated on number of rooms 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%<br />

calculated on number of bedrooms 0.1% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9%<br />

calculated on number of occupants 0.0% 0.5% 10.8% 0.0% 0.0% 4.8%<br />

calculated on number of fixtures 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%<br />

other calculation 0.6% 2.1% 14.6% 5.4% 0.0% 7.1%<br />

other 2.1% 3.1% 4.9% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3%<br />

don't know 7.9% 17.9% 18.1% 23.9% 0.0% 14.3%<br />

<strong>multiple</strong> methods 2.6% 3.8% 4.2% 5.4% 0.0% 3.5%<br />

utility submetered 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 4.5%<br />

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Total<br />

N=725 N=390 N=999 N=92 N=103 N=2309<br />

*Note: These residents were not asked how they were billed for water usage.<br />

Residents responding to the survey were asked whether they were assessed a service<br />

charge on their water bill. Forty-four percent of residents from submetered properties said their<br />

bill included a service charge, while 22% of those from RUBS properties <strong>and</strong> 33% of those from<br />

hot water hybrid properties reported their water bill included a service charge. A large<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!