05.11.2014 Views

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

With a service fee, residents could save up to $41 per year, but they could also lose up to $93 per<br />

year. Table 6.5 shows the economic return for a resident who lives in a property that converts<br />

from in-rent to submetered. This scenario assumes that rent remains unchanged upon converting<br />

to <strong>submetering</strong>. Here, the average residents will annually increase their expenses by $230<br />

without a service fee, or $309 with a service fee. It should be noted that both of these tables<br />

show the resident economic analysis for the short term. It is possible that in the long term, rental<br />

prices could come into equilibrium due to competition, causing the financial impact to be<br />

lessened.<br />

RUBS Properties<br />

RUBS does not have much potential for monetary savings for residents. However, if a<br />

property owner reduces the rent accordingly <strong>and</strong> does not charge a service fee, initially the<br />

average resident should break even. The researchers found no examples of any property owners<br />

adopting this approach.<br />

Summary of Resident Perspective<br />

Based on the results obtained in the resident survey, consumers have varied opinions on<br />

water <strong>billing</strong> <strong>program</strong>s. Often these <strong>program</strong>s result in a water bill in addition to a monthly rent<br />

charge. While consumers receive electric or gas bills, many have come to expect that water<br />

charges are included in the rent. As currently practiced, water <strong>and</strong> wastewater <strong>billing</strong> <strong>program</strong>s<br />

do not appear to be an appealing option for residents of multi-<strong>family</strong> dwellings. Also, residents<br />

are typically charged a service fee (in conformance with applicable state <strong>and</strong> local law) in<br />

addition to their volumetric or allocated charge. Thus, in the short term, these <strong>billing</strong> <strong>program</strong>s<br />

cause an increase in monthly costs for residents. While there may be environmental benefits<br />

such as increased water conservation, there are many uncertainties involving separate <strong>billing</strong> that<br />

could be perceived as negative. Until separate <strong>billing</strong> for water <strong>and</strong> wastewater has some<br />

definitive st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> protections for residents, it is unlikely that most residents will embrace<br />

it. Direct metering <strong>and</strong> <strong>billing</strong> of water for apartment residents encourages water efficiency <strong>and</strong><br />

promotes a water <strong>billing</strong> system that is as transparent as other utilities like gas <strong>and</strong> electricity,<br />

phone <strong>and</strong> cable whereby residents pay for what they use.<br />

194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!