05.11.2014 Views

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Owner/postcard survey: To identify “impact” 2 properties in each utility, owner surveys<br />

were developed, tested <strong>and</strong> implemented to all eligible properties in each utility. This survey<br />

was necessary because in most cases there was no independent source of information about<br />

what properties use the various <strong>billing</strong> systems in any utility service area, <strong>and</strong> the study did<br />

not want to rely on information supplied solely from the <strong>billing</strong> companies, many of whom<br />

could not share their client lists in any case. In order to avoid a fatal bias in the study group<br />

selection, postcards were sent to all owners of multi-<strong>family</strong> properties listed in the water<br />

providers <strong>billing</strong> databases. The responses from this survey were used to identify the impact<br />

properties.<br />

4. Database development: All data collected in this study including historic water <strong>billing</strong><br />

records <strong>and</strong> survey response data were stored in a customized Microsoft Access database.<br />

5. Manager survey: To obtain detailed information about properties identified in the<br />

owner/postcard survey, a survey was developed, tested <strong>and</strong> sent to managers of impacted <strong>and</strong><br />

in-rent properties.<br />

6. Regulatory <strong>and</strong> policy review: To evaluate the administrative <strong>and</strong> regulatory issues<br />

surrounding third party <strong>billing</strong> <strong>program</strong>s throughout the country, surveys were sent to various<br />

potential regulators in all 50 states <strong>and</strong> to more than 100 of the largest water <strong>and</strong> wastewater<br />

utilities. Additionally a detailed policy literature review was conducted.<br />

7. Matched pair selection <strong>and</strong> site visits: Study team utilized the results from the manager<br />

survey to make statistically similar pair matches for site visits <strong>and</strong> comparison. A site visit<br />

protocol was developed <strong>and</strong> the study team worked with participating utilities to conduct site<br />

visits.<br />

8. Resident survey: To solicit resident opinions <strong>and</strong> experiences with different <strong>billing</strong> methods,<br />

a survey instrument was developed, tested, <strong>and</strong> sent to residents using addresses provided on<br />

the manager survey. Some residents also provided copies of their water <strong>and</strong> wastewater bills<br />

sent by various read <strong>and</strong> bill companies or owners.<br />

9. Read <strong>and</strong> bill company survey: To obtain information about <strong>billing</strong> practices <strong>and</strong> policies a<br />

survey was sent to 36 third party <strong>billing</strong> companies.<br />

10. Statistical analysis <strong>and</strong> modeling: Once the data collection <strong>and</strong> analysis was complete, the<br />

2 Impact properties – multi-<strong>family</strong> properties <strong>billing</strong> separately for water <strong>and</strong>/or wastewater services using RUBS,<br />

<strong>submetering</strong>, hot water hybrid, or other methods.<br />

xx

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!