05.11.2014 Views

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

national multiple family submetering and allocation billing program ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 4.12 Administrative difficulties reported with separate <strong>billing</strong> <strong>program</strong>s<br />

What were some of the admin.<br />

difficulties encountered?* † Submetered RUBS<br />

Hot water<br />

hybrid Total<br />

None 60.3% 44.1% 35.7% 48.8%<br />

Didn't have to convert 16.5% 5.9% 3.6% 9.2%<br />

Difficulty obtaining permits 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 0.3%<br />

Resistance from government or<br />

regulatory officials<br />

0.8% 0.9% 3.6% 1.1%<br />

Resistance from local water utility 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 0.3%<br />

Resistance from residents 6.6% 28.2% 39.3% 22.0%<br />

Don't know 10.7% 14.5% 21.4% 13.8%<br />

Other 5.8% 10.5% 14.3% 9.2%<br />

Number N=121 N=220 N=28 N=369<br />

* Percents may add to more than 100% as respondents could give more than one answer.<br />

† Only asked to impact properties<br />

About 30% of properties reported water bill non-payment rates of more than 10%. The<br />

average non-payment rate reported was 6.4%. Residents are most frequently billed monthly for<br />

water (94% of properties), <strong>and</strong> the large majority (83%) of properties include wastewater service<br />

charges with the residents’ water bill. Many impact properties also include a monthly service<br />

charge on the residents’ water bill; 46% of submetered properties, 26% of RUBS properties, <strong>and</strong><br />

61% of hot water hybrid properties.<br />

Most rental impact properties (92%) include language about the residents’ paying for<br />

water in the lease agreement. In many cases (82%), managers indicated that a resident’s security<br />

deposit could be docked for failure to pay the water bill 22 .<br />

Water Fixture Change-out<br />

Managers of properties built before 1995 (when the 1992 EPACT would have been in full<br />

effect) were asked whether they had replaced plumbing fixtures within the dwelling units on<br />

their property since 1995. As shown in Figure 4.12 below, about 10% to 30% of properties<br />

constructed before 1995 had replaced three-quarters or more of the toilets, faucets, showerheads<br />

or washing machines since 1995. The proportions were roughly similar between impact <strong>and</strong> inrent<br />

properties.<br />

22 It has since been brought to the researchers’ attention that it is illegal in some states for managers to use resident<br />

security deposits for utility bill non-payment.<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!