Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...
Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...
Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Consequences of Incomplete Notification<br />
Generally, ERCB staff follow the requirements of each application unit to determine whether<br />
a notification program meets the requirements of Section 26 of the Energy <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Conservation Act (ERCA). This section requires the ERCB to ensure that all potentially<br />
directly <strong>and</strong> adversely affected persons are given notice of an application <strong>and</strong> have a<br />
reasonable opportunity to make representations to the ERCB regarding the application.<br />
For some application types, the ERCB requires that you provide a description of your<br />
notification program <strong>and</strong> documented evidence of the results in your application, including a<br />
list of the persons notified <strong>and</strong> a copy of the notification letter.<br />
The ERCB will review your notification in<strong>for</strong>mation to ensure that you have met the<br />
requirements in this directive. Should it be determined that inadequate notification was<br />
provided or that not all potentially directly <strong>and</strong> adversely affected persons were notified, the<br />
application in most cases will be closed.<br />
If an application has been approved, an affected person who was not notified may file an<br />
application <strong>for</strong> review under Section 39 or 40 of the ERCA requesting that the approval be<br />
reviewed. If the ERCB grants the review application, a hearing will be scheduled. The<br />
approval may be suspended pending the outcome of the review.<br />
Responding to Concerns Raised During the Notification Process<br />
The ERCB expects applicants to engage in meaningful discussions with any person who has<br />
raised concerns or has questions respecting a proposed application. It is expected that<br />
applicants will make substantial ef<strong>for</strong>ts to resolve the matter prior to filing <strong>and</strong> during the<br />
review of a resources application, including use of third-party mediators, as discussed in the<br />
ERCB’s Appropriate Dispute Resolution (ADR) program described in ERCB In<strong>for</strong>mational<br />
Letter (IL) 2001-01.<br />
If an applicant has made no attempt to respond to a person who has expressed concerns or is<br />
seeking underst<strong>and</strong>ing or answers to questions, the application, in most cases, will be closed.<br />
The ERCB recognizes that discussions may come to an impasse or that a person who has<br />
expressed concerns may decline to participate in the ADR process. Additionally, in some<br />
cases, a company may be of the view that the objection is not relevant to the issues of the<br />
application <strong>and</strong> that beyond initial ef<strong>for</strong>ts it should not be required to attempt to resolve the<br />
issue. In these cases, the company may proceed to file its application (if not filed) <strong>and</strong> to<br />
include the letter(s) objecting to the proposal, its response to the objection(s), <strong>and</strong> a<br />
discussion of its view of how the ERCB should proceed with the application.<br />
16 • ERCB <strong>Directive</strong> <strong>065</strong>: <strong>Resources</strong> <strong>Applications</strong> / Notification Guidelines (October 2011)