01.12.2014 Views

Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...

Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...

Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Requirements<br />

Comments<br />

production, you may make a comparison<br />

between the actual produced volume from the<br />

well <strong>and</strong> the volume the well should have<br />

produced to obtain an equitable share of<br />

production. You should present a detailed<br />

calculation showing how you determined<br />

your equitable share of production.<br />

12) A discussion of the practicability, economics,<br />

<strong>and</strong> any environmental concerns of<br />

a) the proposed common processor<br />

operation,<br />

b) the alternative of building new facilities,<br />

For each case, the economic analysis should<br />

include a detailed itemization of all costs<br />

(excluding sunk costs), <strong>for</strong>ecasts of<br />

production <strong>and</strong> revenue streams, <strong>and</strong><br />

tabulations of be<strong>for</strong>e-tax rate of return,<br />

payback, <strong>and</strong> present value analyses.<br />

c) the alternative of using other facilities<br />

(such as taking the gas to another<br />

existing plant), <strong>and</strong><br />

d) any other alternatives available.<br />

13) A discussion of the availability or the<br />

reasonable expectation of a market <strong>for</strong> your<br />

gas that would be processed at the plant.<br />

14) If you are requesting, pursuant to Section<br />

53(5)(a) of the OGCA, that the ERCB, in<br />

order to give effect to the common processor<br />

declaration, direct the proportion of<br />

production to be processed by the common<br />

processor from each producer or owner in the<br />

pool or pools,<br />

a) a discussion <strong>and</strong> documentation<br />

indicating what negotiations were carried<br />

out in regard to distributing production<br />

among wells in the pool <strong>and</strong> where the<br />

impasse lies, <strong>and</strong><br />

b) a discussion of your proposal as to how<br />

the ERCB should distribute production<br />

from the pool, including a tabulation of<br />

the proportion or percentage of total<br />

production that each well or group of<br />

wells should be allowed to produce,<br />

together with the details of how the<br />

proposed production scheme was<br />

obtained.<br />

The ERCB’s usual practice is to allocate<br />

production among wells in a pool on a<br />

percentage basis, rather than setting any<br />

specific rate or volume. The proportion of<br />

production allocated to each well is<br />

commonly based on the following <strong>for</strong>mula:<br />

Percentage of pool production <strong>for</strong> specific<br />

well = 100 x (wellbore net pay x porosity x<br />

gas saturation x area of spacing unit or<br />

validated area <strong>for</strong> specific well)/(sum of<br />

wellbore net pay x porosity x gas saturation x<br />

area of spacing units or validated areas <strong>for</strong><br />

all wells).<br />

<strong>Directive</strong> 032 <strong>and</strong> Decision 91-8 offer<br />

discussions of the ERCB’s commonly used<br />

allocation <strong>for</strong>mula <strong>and</strong> the validated area<br />

concept. The ERCB has not generally used<br />

mapping as a means to determine<br />

hydrocarbon pore volume in a spacing unit<br />

because in many cases such mapping is<br />

highly interpretive. The ERCB has not<br />

normally factored the deliverability of a well<br />

1-26 • ERCB <strong>Directive</strong> <strong>065</strong>: <strong>Resources</strong> <strong>Applications</strong> / Common Processor (October 2011)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!