01.12.2014 Views

Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...

Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...

Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Requirements<br />

15) If you are requesting, pursuant to Section 56<br />

of the OGCA, that the proposed order be<br />

effective prior to the date the order is issued<br />

but not prior to the date the application <strong>for</strong><br />

the order was made to the ERCB, a<br />

discussion as to why the order should be<br />

effective on the requested date, including<br />

Comments<br />

a) the steps that you have taken to market<br />

your production, <strong>and</strong><br />

b) an indication of whether your well is<br />

tied into a gathering system <strong>and</strong>, if not,<br />

why the order should be made on a<br />

retroactive basis.<br />

16) If you are requesting, pursuant to Section<br />

55(1) or (3) of the OGCA, that the ERCB set<br />

the fee to be paid to the common carrier <strong>for</strong><br />

the transportation of the gas or oil,<br />

a) a discussion <strong>and</strong> documentation<br />

indicating what negotiations were<br />

carried out respecting the fee to be paid<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the impasse lies,<br />

b) a statement of the fee you propose be<br />

paid <strong>for</strong> the transportation of the gas or<br />

oil under the common carrier order,<br />

together with a discussion of why you<br />

believe the fee proposed is fair in<br />

comparison to the fee offered,<br />

c) if you have calculated the fee you<br />

propose be paid using the JP-05<br />

<strong>for</strong>mulas,<br />

i) a tabulation of the values used in the<br />

calculations, <strong>and</strong><br />

ii) a discussion of the basis <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

source <strong>for</strong> each value used in the<br />

calculation, <strong>and</strong><br />

d) if you have calculated the fee you<br />

propose be paid using a methodology<br />

other than the JP-05 <strong>for</strong>mulas (see<br />

Comments column), a detailed<br />

discussion of how the fee was obtained<br />

<strong>and</strong> why the ERCB should used the<br />

methodology proposed rather than the<br />

JP-05 <strong>for</strong>mula.<br />

If you are not asking the ERCB to set the<br />

tariff to be charged by the common carrier<br />

<strong>for</strong> the transportation of the gas under the<br />

common carrier order, you do not need to<br />

include the in<strong>for</strong>mation noted in item 16.<br />

Your response to item 16(a) may be<br />

combined with your response to item 4.<br />

Normally, the ERCB would consider setting<br />

the fee to be paid under a common carrier<br />

order only if there were a specific dispute on<br />

the fee issue. There<strong>for</strong>e, if you are requesting<br />

the ERCB to set the fee, you must show that<br />

this is a specific area of dispute <strong>and</strong> that you<br />

have made substantial ef<strong>for</strong>ts to negotiate a<br />

resolution to the matter prior to making this<br />

request.<br />

Decision 2006-021 confirms the ERCB’s<br />

support <strong>for</strong> the setting of tariffs <strong>and</strong> fees<br />

using the <strong>for</strong>mula <strong>and</strong> principles set out in<br />

JP-05: A Recommended Practice <strong>for</strong> the<br />

Negotiation of Processing Fees (JP-05).<br />

You may propose an alternative way of<br />

calculating a fair fee other than the JP-05<br />

<strong>for</strong>mula; however, you should offer detailed<br />

justification as to why the ERCB should not<br />

use the JP-05 <strong>for</strong>mula <strong>for</strong> the case in<br />

question.<br />

1-20 • ERCB <strong>Directive</strong> <strong>065</strong>: <strong>Resources</strong> <strong>Applications</strong> / Common Carrier (October 2011)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!