Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...
Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...
Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Requirements<br />
15) If you are requesting, pursuant to Section 56<br />
of the OGCA, that the proposed order be<br />
effective prior to the date the order is issued<br />
but not prior to the date the application <strong>for</strong><br />
the order was made to the ERCB, a<br />
discussion as to why the order should be<br />
effective on the requested date, including<br />
Comments<br />
a) the steps that you have taken to market<br />
your production, <strong>and</strong><br />
b) an indication of whether your well is<br />
tied into a gathering system <strong>and</strong>, if not,<br />
why the order should be made on a<br />
retroactive basis.<br />
16) If you are requesting, pursuant to Section<br />
55(1) or (3) of the OGCA, that the ERCB set<br />
the fee to be paid to the common carrier <strong>for</strong><br />
the transportation of the gas or oil,<br />
a) a discussion <strong>and</strong> documentation<br />
indicating what negotiations were<br />
carried out respecting the fee to be paid<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the impasse lies,<br />
b) a statement of the fee you propose be<br />
paid <strong>for</strong> the transportation of the gas or<br />
oil under the common carrier order,<br />
together with a discussion of why you<br />
believe the fee proposed is fair in<br />
comparison to the fee offered,<br />
c) if you have calculated the fee you<br />
propose be paid using the JP-05<br />
<strong>for</strong>mulas,<br />
i) a tabulation of the values used in the<br />
calculations, <strong>and</strong><br />
ii) a discussion of the basis <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
source <strong>for</strong> each value used in the<br />
calculation, <strong>and</strong><br />
d) if you have calculated the fee you<br />
propose be paid using a methodology<br />
other than the JP-05 <strong>for</strong>mulas (see<br />
Comments column), a detailed<br />
discussion of how the fee was obtained<br />
<strong>and</strong> why the ERCB should used the<br />
methodology proposed rather than the<br />
JP-05 <strong>for</strong>mula.<br />
If you are not asking the ERCB to set the<br />
tariff to be charged by the common carrier<br />
<strong>for</strong> the transportation of the gas under the<br />
common carrier order, you do not need to<br />
include the in<strong>for</strong>mation noted in item 16.<br />
Your response to item 16(a) may be<br />
combined with your response to item 4.<br />
Normally, the ERCB would consider setting<br />
the fee to be paid under a common carrier<br />
order only if there were a specific dispute on<br />
the fee issue. There<strong>for</strong>e, if you are requesting<br />
the ERCB to set the fee, you must show that<br />
this is a specific area of dispute <strong>and</strong> that you<br />
have made substantial ef<strong>for</strong>ts to negotiate a<br />
resolution to the matter prior to making this<br />
request.<br />
Decision 2006-021 confirms the ERCB’s<br />
support <strong>for</strong> the setting of tariffs <strong>and</strong> fees<br />
using the <strong>for</strong>mula <strong>and</strong> principles set out in<br />
JP-05: A Recommended Practice <strong>for</strong> the<br />
Negotiation of Processing Fees (JP-05).<br />
You may propose an alternative way of<br />
calculating a fair fee other than the JP-05<br />
<strong>for</strong>mula; however, you should offer detailed<br />
justification as to why the ERCB should not<br />
use the JP-05 <strong>for</strong>mula <strong>for</strong> the case in<br />
question.<br />
1-20 • ERCB <strong>Directive</strong> <strong>065</strong>: <strong>Resources</strong> <strong>Applications</strong> / Common Carrier (October 2011)